___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:18 AM @lbutlr wrote:
> On 16 Jun 2020, at 14:55, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > sysutils/lsof ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES /usr/src to be able to build.
>
> Is there a list of the files in src that it requires?
>
> Can I delete the rest?
>
> (Tranferring 1.5GB is far less of an issu
On 16 Jun 2020, at 14:55, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> sysutils/lsof ABSOLUTELY REQUIRES /usr/src to be able to build.
Is there a list of the files in src that it requires?
Can I delete the rest?
(Tranferring 1.5GB is far less of an issue than keeping 1.5GB around).
--
Get in there you big furry o
> On 17 Jun 2020, at 07:35, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> On 17/06/2020 04:23, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Thank you, cleared /usr/src and running the svn checkout with that
>> URL now. It's still well over a gig so it will be a few minutes
>> before trying to build lsof again.
> Alas, it is a bit late now,
On 17/06/2020 04:23, @lbutlr wrote:
> Thank you, cleared /usr/src and running the svn checkout with that
> URL now. It's still well over a gig so it will be a few minutes
> before trying to build lsof again.
Alas, it is a bit late now, but next time you need to switch branches
like this, use `svn s
On 16 Jun 2020, at 21:14, George Mitchell wrote:
> On 2020-06-16 23:12, George Mitchell wrote:
>> On 2020-06-16 23:10, @lbutlr wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Needless to say, I was expecting that checkout would give me 12.1, but I
>>> don't see how to get that.
> Pardon the typo:
>
> https://svn.freebsd
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 15:11, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> On 16 Jun 2020, at 06:40, Mike Bristow wrote:
> > What is the output of "egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)'
> > /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh" ?
>
> Well, this seems like it might be bad:
>
> # egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers
On 16 Jun 2020, at 06:40, Mike Bristow wrote:
> What is the output of "egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)'
> /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh" ?
Well, this seems like it might be bad:
# egrep '^(TYPE|REVISION|BRANCH)' /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
TYPE="FreeBSD"
REVISION="13.0"
BRANCH=${BRANCH_OVERRIDE:
On Jun 16, 2020, at 06:41, Mike Bristow wrote:
>
> That is not present in the file on relent/12.1, which is probably the same as
> yours. I suspect that you have an out-of-date /usr/src.
I just installed the source, and ran the svn update just in case.
> (This does beg the question of why yo
Hi,
On 15/06/2020 02:52, @lbutlr wrote:
When trying to update lsof on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p5 GENERIC i386 I get the
following fatal error:
/usr/src/sys/sys/pcpu.h:224:10: fatal error: 'machine/pcpu_aux.h' file not found
#include
^~~~
That is not present in the fi
21.03.2020 4:30, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:10, Robert Huff wrote:
>> Adam Weinberger writes:
>>
===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8
===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof
===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
===>>> requires
On 03/20/2020 9:09 pm, Robert Huff wrote:
Larry Rosenman writes:
I'd love to see the kernel folks make better interfaces.
I've been saying that for 2 years.
Can you be one step more specific on what interface it needs?
Respectfully,
Larry Rosenman writes:
> I'd love to see the kernel folks make better interfaces.
>
> I've been saying that for 2 years.
Can you be one step more specific on what interface it needs?
Respectfully,
Robert Huff
On 03/20/2020 5:53 pm, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:45 PM Dave Horsfall
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> That error should only occur if system sources are missing from
> /usr/src. Check that they're still there, and if not then check them out
> from sv
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:45 PM Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
> > That error should only occur if system sources are missing from
> > /usr/src. Check that they're still there, and if not then check them out
> > from svn.
>
> Does it not require kernel heade
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Adam Weinberger wrote:
That error should only occur if system sources are missing from
/usr/src. Check that they're still there, and if not then check them out
from svn.
Does it not require kernel header files only? Only distributed with the
source, which annoyed me bec
On 20 Mar 2020, at 15:30, @lbutlr wrote:
> PORTS+MODULE=sysutils/lsof
Oops.
--
Say, give it up, give it up, television's taking its toll That's
enough, that's enough, gimme the remote control I've been nice,
I've been good, please don't do this to me Turn it off, turn it
On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:10, Robert Huff wrote:
> Adam Weinberger writes:
>
>>> ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8
>>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof
>>>
>>>===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
>>>===>>> requires kernel sources
>>
>> That error should
Adam Weinberger writes:
> > ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8
> > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof
> >
> > ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE
> > ===>>> requires kernel sources
>
> That error should only occur if system sources are missing fr
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM @lbutlr wrote:
>
> Got this when trying tu update lsof:
>
> ===>>> lsof-4.93.2_9,8
> ===>>> New version available: lsof-4.93.2_10,8
>
> ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8
> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof
>
> ===>>> T
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> ** Is this the same sources you have done a make buildworld buildkernel
> installworld installkernel
>
> With?
>
>
I would bet not - unfortunately, I don't remember enough / know enough
about cvsup/csup to know if I just got head-of-line, o
Is this the same sources you have done a make buildworld buildkernel
installworld installkernel
With?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Chris Inacio wrote:
The solution is apparently to install the system src. There doesn't appear to
be a ports/package to
The solution is apparently to install the system src. There doesn't appear
to be a ports/package to manage that.
The solutions was supposed to be to install the system source. I used csup
to install the system source, and it got further, with a different error:
===> Building for lsof-4.86B,6
Make sure the system sources are on the system
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Chris Inacio wrote:
There was no config.log to attach to the report. This is the (hopefully)
relevant screen text.
=> Attempting to fetch
ftp://lsof.itap.purdue.edu/pub/tool
On 20.04.2011 23:36, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 21:15:36 +0300
Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 20.04.2011 20:52, Larry Rosenman wrote:
What flavor machine is this? Does the kernel and world match the
running system?
This is troubling, from a system header:
In file included from ../
-2683 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
-Original Message-
From: Gritsuk Anton [mailto:gni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:16 PM
To: Larry Rosenman
Cc: 'freebsd-ports'
Subject: Re: lsof doesn't install
On 20.04.2011 20:52, Larry Rosenman wrote:
What flavor machine is this? Does the kernel and world match the running
system?
This is troubling, from a system header:
In file included from ../dlsof.h:412,
from ../lsof.h:195,
from ckkv.c:43:
/usr/src/sys/sys/u
What flavor machine is this? Does the kernel and world match the running
system?
This is troubling, from a system header:
In file included from ../dlsof.h:412,
from ../lsof.h:195,
from ckkv.c:43:
/usr/src/sys/sys/user.h:92:2: error: #error "Unknown architecture
On Sun, November 1, 2009 1:48 pm, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> [lsof maintainer added to Cc:]
>
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:10:07PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Are your system sources current? and do they match the running system?
>>
>> it compiles file for me on:
>
> But if you update your FreeBS
I'm in contact with Vic Abell (LSOF author), and will get an update out soon.
Thanks!
On Sun, November 1, 2009 1:48 pm, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> [lsof maintainer added to Cc:]
>
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:10:07PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> Are your system sources current? and do they match
[lsof maintainer added to Cc:]
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:10:07PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Are your system sources current? and do they match the running system?
>
> it compiles file for me on:
But if you update your FreeBSD system to the very latest (or at least after
Oct 29) it will not
Are your system sources current? and do they match the running system?
it compiles file for me on:
# uname -a
FreeBSD thebighonker.lerctr.org 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #31: Tue Oct
27 17:56:57 CDT 2009
r...@thebighonker.lerctr.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THEBIGHONKER amd64
#
On Sun, Novem
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 03:15:32PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> Lowell Gilbert writes:
>
> > It seems to me (fairly short investigation) that it uses kernel
> > structures that aren't in /usr/include. That means it must be
> > looking in /usr/src/sys. If those sources don't match the
> > inst
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> It seems to me (fairly short investigation) that it uses kernel
> structures that aren't in /usr/include. That means it must be
> looking in /usr/src/sys. If those sources don't match the
> installed kernel exactly, that typically won't be a problem,
> because kerne
Robert Huff writes:
> Lowell Gilbert writes:
>
>> >> Are you saying you rebuilt kernel and lsof built fine afterwards?
>>
>> Right. lsof needs to look at kernel structures, so it has to be
>> built from the same headers that the kernel was, or it won't know
>> how to interpret the data it
ner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-po...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert Huff
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 6:42 PM
To: Lowell Gilbert
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: lsof won't build
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> >> Are you saying you rebuilt kernel an
Lowell Gilbert writes:
> >> Are you saying you rebuilt kernel and lsof built fine afterwards?
>
> Right. lsof needs to look at kernel structures, so it has to be
> built from the same headers that the kernel was, or it won't know
> how to interpret the data it retrieves.
And it f
--On September 19, 2009 6:16:22 PM -0400 Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Robert Huff writes:
Paul Schmehl writes:
> The usual casue of this is the installed kernel(+world ??)
> being out of sync with the contents of /usr/src.
That doesn't make sense to me. vm.h is a src file.
I hav
Robert Huff writes:
> Paul Schmehl writes:
>
>> > The usual casue of this is the installed kernel(+world ??)
>> > being out of sync with the contents of /usr/src.
>>
>> That doesn't make sense to me. vm.h is a src file.
>
> I have not read the code ... but as I understnd it, the bui
Paul Schmehl writes:
> >The usual casue of this is the installed kernel(+world ??)
> > being out of sync with the contents of /usr/src.
>
> That doesn't make sense to me. vm.h is a src file.
I have not read the code ... but as I understnd it, the build
process draws on header f
--On September 19, 2009 1:58:32 PM -0400 Robert Huff
wrote:
Paul Schmehl writes:
I'm getting this error when trying to install sysutils/lsof:
/usr/src/sys/vm/vm.h:64:24: error: machine/vm.h: No such file or
directory
Shouldn't machine be some sort of macro that points at the ARCH
of
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009, Larry Rosenman wrote:
Yes, I'm aware that sysutils/lsof is busted on very recent -CURRENT.
I've already sent mail to the maintainer, and expect fixes in a few days
(he's retired, so slack is given).
The AUTHOR has gotten back to me quicker than I expected, and the PR is i
l 14, 2008 8:48 PM
To: Ganbold
Cc: Larry Rosenman; Rong-en Fan; Jonathan Chen; freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: lsof 4.79K build fails
Ganbold writes:
> lsof-4.79K compiles fine here.
Still getting:
cc -pipe -g -march=pentium4 -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE
-
Ganbold writes:
> lsof-4.79K compiles fine here.
Still getting:
cc -pipe -g -march=pentium4 -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE
-DHASCPUMASK_T -DHASSBSTATE -DHAS_KVM_VNODE -DHAS_UFS1_2 -DHAS_NO_SI_UDEV
-DHAS_SI_PRIV -DHAS_SYS_SX_H -DFREEBSDV=7000 -DHASFDESCFS=2 -DHASPSEUDOFS
-DH
Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Ganbold wrote:
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:51:17AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr
Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Ganbold wrote:
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:51:17AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Ganbold wrote:
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:51:17AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jo
Jonathan Chen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:51:17AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latest update for sysutils/lsof to 4.79K ends in the following
> when building on 7_STABLE:
>
> cc -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHASEFFNLINK=i_effnlink -DHASF_VNODE
> -DHASCPUMASK_T -DHASSBSTATE -DHAS_KVM_VNODE
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:51:17AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The lat
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The latest update for sysutils/lsof to 4.79K ends in the following
> > > w
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 09:36:36AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The latest update for sysutils/lsof to 4.79K ends in the following
> > when building on 7_STABLE:
> >
> > cc -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DHASEFFNLINK=i_
Vic,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Vic Abell wrote:
VA> I'll let you know when I have something to test. As I said
VA> earlier, this will be a substantial modification. I will
VA> provide a pre-release distribution in the 4.79 series,
VA> probably an 'F' edition, that you can download and build.
Thank y
Dmitry,
You write:
>
> I'll more than happy to test on my machines with ZFS root -
> my home FreeBSD workstation has been configured with ZFS-on-root, and so
my
> notebook FreeBSD boot (it's triple-booted).
>
> Which info should I provide?
The important thing will be to make sure that lsof rep
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Vic Abell wrote:
VA> Larry,
VA>
VA> You write:
VA> >
VA> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
VA> > >
VA> > > The only additional thing I would like to bring attention
VA> > > at is the fact that
VA> > > ZFS can be used as root, requiring to additionally patch
VA>
Larry,
You write:
>
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> >
> > The only additional thing I would like to bring attention
> > at is the fact that
> > ZFS can be used as root, requiring to additionally patch
> > lsof like FreeSBIE people did for cd9660 root.
I'm not sure about that.
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Wesley Shields wrote:
WS> > > can anyone sched me a light when lsof start supporting ZFS under
FreeBSD? I
WS> > > tried to quick hack configure, but did not have much success...
WS> > >
WS> > I actually talked to the author the o
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:59:00PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Wesley Shields wrote:
>
> WS> > > can anyone sched me a light when lsof start supporting ZFS under
> FreeBSD? I
> WS> > > tried to quick hack configure, but did not have much success...
> WS> > >
> WS> > I
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Wesley Shields wrote:
WS> > > can anyone sched me a light when lsof start supporting ZFS under
FreeBSD? I
WS> > > tried to quick hack configure, but did not have much success...
WS> > >
WS> > I actually talked to the author the other day on a different matter, and
WS> > he m
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:39:24PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:51:36AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
>
> Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > can anyone sched me a light when lsof start supporting ZFS under FreeBSD? I
> > tried to quick hack configure, but did n
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 10:51:36AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
Hi Dmitry,
>
> can anyone sched me a light when lsof start supporting ZFS under FreeBSD? I
> tried to quick hack configure, but did not have much success...
>
I actually talked to the author the other day on a
61 matches
Mail list logo
