On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:30, yanefbsd@ wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:12 AM, jhell wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:53, gerald@ wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, jhell wrote:
I still have not resolved the issue or found any leading cause after
scrubbing my ports tree completely and grabbing a new copy
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 6:12 AM, jhell wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:53, gerald@ wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, jhell wrote:
>>>
>>> I still have not resolved the issue or found any leading cause after
>>> scrubbing my ports tree completely and grabbing a new copy. Also
>>> scrubbed my src.con
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:12:42 -0500
jhell wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:53, gerald@ wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, jhell wrote:
> >> I still have not resolved the issue or found any leading cause
> >> after scrubbing my ports tree completely and grabbing a new copy.
> >> Also scrubbed my src.co
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:53, gerald@ wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, jhell wrote:
I still have not resolved the issue or found any leading cause after
scrubbing my ports tree completely and grabbing a new copy. Also
scrubbed my src.conf make.conf and make.conf.local and ran with and
without a jail and
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, jhell wrote:
> I still have not resolved the issue or found any leading cause after
> scrubbing my ports tree completely and grabbing a new copy. Also
> scrubbed my src.conf make.conf and make.conf.local and ran with and
> without a jail and can still get those files.
So, yo
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:17, jhell@ wrote:
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:01, gerald@ wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, jhell wrote:
Below my .sig is what I found upon removal of the old version of gcc44
0126 before re-building 0209.
Is there a chance to get this fixed ?
Not sure exactly whats causing this
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:01, gerald@ wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, jhell wrote:
Below my .sig is what I found upon removal of the old version of gcc44
0126 before re-building 0209.
Is there a chance to get this fixed ?
Not sure exactly whats causing this so I did not look further into it.
Looki
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, jhell wrote:
> Below my .sig is what I found upon removal of the old version of gcc44
> 0126 before re-building 0209.
>
> Is there a chance to get this fixed ?
>
> Not sure exactly whats causing this so I did not look further into it.
Looking at the specific error message,
