Re: k3b 2.0

2010-07-28 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:13:56 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? > I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because > kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present). > > Regards > Port for k3b-2.0.0 is availa

Re: k3b 2.0

2010-07-28 Thread Gökşin Akdeniz
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 11:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? It already started http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-freebsd/2010-July/008931.html signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: k3b 2.0

2010-07-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? > >> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because > >> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present)

Re: k3b 2.0

2010-07-28 Thread ajtiM
On Wednesday 28 July 2010 03:13:56 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? > I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because > kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present). > > Regards I did install Arch Linux on my w

Re: k3b 2.0

2010-07-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? > I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because > kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present). I've seen kdelibs fail on 2 x amd64 8.1-RC2, breaking build of graphics/

Re: k3b 2.0

2010-07-28 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 28/07/2010 11:23, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> Just out of curiosity, is anyone working on porting k3b 2.0? >> I'd like to get rid of the KDE3 legacy. Especially, because >> kdelibs3 is such a pain to build (fails if openssl-1.0 is present). > > I've seen kdelibs fail on