On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:28:06PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:31:19PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 2012-10-09 17:15:47 -0400, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I do not see the point
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 08:31:19PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2012-10-09 17:15:47 -0400, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I do not see the point to keep diablo-jdk as a build dependency of
> > java. Is there something that preve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-10-09 17:15:47 -0400, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do not see the point to keep diablo-jdk as a build dependency of
> java. Is there something that prevent us to distribute a package
> of openjdk, just to be able to built a native
