On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 05:43:23PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 15:18, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
> >> gmake, gtar etc, but appare
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
> gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
> to the different gstat utility in base.
>
> I'm reluctant to simply rename the c
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Would anyone yell too much if I _just_ changed gstat to gnustat?
>
Probably, but you should ignore them. ;)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On 31 October 2011 15:18, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
>> gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
>> to the different gstat util
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 09:21:26AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Traditionally we've tended to use the 'g' prefix for GNU utilities;
> gmake, gtar etc, but apparently with stat that is a problem [1], due
> to the different gstat utility in base.
>
> I'm reluctant to simply rename the co
