On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:23:38 +0300 (MSK) Dmitry Morozovsky
wrote
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Chris H wrote:
>
> > > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> > > >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
> > > >dependency bloat and have a simple s
Max,
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> > > > > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> > > > > >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill
> > > > > >the
> > > > > >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option.
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 11:00:26 + Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:23:38 +0300 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Chris H wrote:
> >
> > > > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> > > > >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so
On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 12:23:38 +0300 Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Chris H wrote:
>
> > > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> > > >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
> > > >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-ba
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014, Chris H wrote:
> > >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> > >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
> > >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option.
> > >
> > >Anyone up for a weekend challeng
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:51:11 + Matt Smith wrote
> On Dec 23 07:44, Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> >It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
> >lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
> >dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entr
On Dec 23 07:44, Mark Felder wrote:
It looks as though it would be feasible to write an extremely
lightweight pinentry-compatible program to depend on so we can kill the
dependency bloat and have a simple shell-based password entry option.
Anyone up for a weekend challenge? :-)
There has been
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014, at 03:46, Matt Smith wrote:
> On Dec 22 22:33, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Once upon a time, installing gnupg didn't require pinentry, and I
> >could run it quite happily on the command line. However, nowadays if I
> >install the port it drags in pinentry and a whole
On Dec 22 22:33, Jonathan Chen wrote:
Hi,
Once upon a time, installing gnupg didn't require pinentry, and I
could run it quite happily on the command line. However, nowadays if I
install the port it drags in pinentry and a whole set of graphical
libraries that I don't really need on a headless b
