On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 22:52:05 +0200
marek...@gmail.com wrote:
> I noticed that it's necessary to match the versions of biblatex and
> biber. With the up-to-date packages (biblatex v2.8a), I had to
> install biber v1.8 and not the newest one.
That's correct, biblatex and biber versions are strictl
Nikola Lečić writes:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:14:21 +0100
> marek...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Kurt Jaeger writes:
>>
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> >> If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that
>> >> Biber is missing from one of the texlive packages?
>> >
>> > Probably, yes.
>> >
>> >> Or sh
On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:14:21 +0100
marek...@gmail.com wrote:
> Kurt Jaeger writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> >> If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that
> >> Biber is missing from one of the texlive packages?
> >
> > Probably, yes.
> >
> >> Or should it get a port on its own?
> >
>
Kurt Jaeger writes:
> Hi!
>
>> If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is
>> missing from one of the texlive packages?
>
> Probably, yes.
>
>> Or should it get a port on its own?
>
> There's an old (2012) discussion at
>
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-
On 1/11/15 3:39 AM, Marek Rudnicki wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex,
with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it.
I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages?
Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find
Hi!
> If the documentation is present texlive-docs, does it mean that Biber is
> missing from one of the texlive packages?
Probably, yes.
> Or should it get a port on its own?
There's an old (2012) discussion at
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-May/075180.html
which sugg
Kurt Jaeger writes:
> Hi!
>
>> There are several ports related to bibtex:
>
> Clearly, that was too much:
>
> grep ^bib INDEX-10 | tr '|' ' ' | while read p pp j; doecho $p $pp; done
>
> So:
>
> bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv
> bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed
> b
Hi!
> There are several ports related to bibtex:
Clearly, that was too much:
grep ^bib INDEX-10 | tr '|' ' ' | while read p pp j; doecho $p $pp; done
So:
bibtexconv-1.0.0 /usr/ports/converters/bibtexconv
bibcursed-2.0.1 /usr/ports/print/bibcursed
biblio-py-0.6.1 /usr/ports/print/biblio-py
Hi!
> I was trying to use Biber (BibTeX replacement for users of biblatex,
> with full Unicode support), but I was unable to find it.
>
> I was wandering, why is it not present in one of the texlive packages?
> Or is it hidden somewhere and I'm not able to find it?
There are several ports relate
