Re: This construction doesn't work

2010-06-29 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Tuesday, June 29, 2010 09:02:35 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: I'm working on a port update for one of the ports that I maintain, and I've run into a problem that I can't seem to solve. I use this construction to en

Re: This construction doesn't work

2010-06-29 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Paul Schmehl wrote: >> >> I'm working on a port update for one of the ports that I maintain, and >> I've run into a problem that I can't seem to solve. >> >> I use this construction to ensure that the port doesn't overwrite the conf >> file,

Re: This construction doesn't work

2010-06-29 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I'm working on a port update for one of the ports that I maintain, and I've > run into a problem that I can't seem to solve. > > I use this construction to ensure that the port doesn't overwrite the conf > file, if one exists: > > .for f in ba

Re: This construction doesn't work

2010-06-28 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Paul Schmehl wrote: I'm working on a port update for one of the ports that I maintain, and I've run into a problem that I can't seem to solve. I use this construction to ensure that the port doesn't overwrite the conf file, if one exists: .for f in barnyard2.conf ${INSTALL_DATA} ${WR

Re: This construction doesn't work

2010-06-28 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Em 2010.06.29. 0:24, Paul Schmehl escreveu: I'm working on a port update for one of the ports that I maintain, and I've run into a problem that I can't seem to solve. I use this construction to ensure that the port doesn't overwrite the conf file, if one exists: .for f in barnyard2.conf