On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 09:06:40 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote:
> > > I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
> >
> > doing
> >
> > > sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 7/28/15 10:43 PM, David Naylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
>
>>> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative
>>> path but not
>
>>> when using an
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote:
> > > I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
> > doing
> > > static linking
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote:
> > I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
> doing
> > static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
> > the por
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
doing
> static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
> the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary?
```
# cd /usr/loca
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> > Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path
but not
> > when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
>
> What is the output for readelf?
>
> readelf -d `which pyp
On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path but not
> when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
What is the output for readelf?
readelf -d `which pypy`|grep -i libr
--
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian) doing
static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary?
Kind regards,
Bartek Rutkowski
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:46 PM, David Naylor wrote:
