On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:59:32PM -0700, Kevin Downey wrote:
> On 3/21/06, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I have just realized that maybe the best approach to address this
> >problem would be not reverting the change in question, but making
> >find_local_scripts_new() more strict, so
On 3/21/06, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have just realized that maybe the best approach to address this
problem would be not reverting the change in question, but making
find_local_scripts_new() more strict, so that only those local rc.d
scripts that have been explicitly marked by
I have just realized that maybe the best approach to address this
problem would be not reverting the change in question, but making
find_local_scripts_new() more strict, so that only those local rc.d
scripts that have been explicitly marked by maintainer as fully
rc.d-safe are handled in a new
