On 05/20/16 06:00, Shane Ambler wrote:
> Having a look at bsdstats.org they show port install numbers of
>
> py27-sqlalchemy9
> py27-sqlalchemy06 147
> py27-sqlalchemy08 1
>
> It may be worth considering keeping 0.6 for compatibility and drop 0.7,
> 0.8, 0.9
Having so many ports depend on
On 19/05/2016 16:55, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 18/05/2016 23:04, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
I'm proposing the following:
py-sqlalchemy06 0.6.9 ni...@freebsd.org (Deprecate 2016-08-20)
py-sqlalchemy07 0.7.10 ni...@freebsd.org (Deprecate 2016-08-20)
py-sqlalchemy08 0.8
On 18/05/2016 23:04, Olivier Duchateau wrote:
>> I'm proposing the following:
>> >
>> >py-sqlalchemy06 0.6.9 ni...@freebsd.org (Deprecate 2016-08-20)
>> >py-sqlalchemy07 0.7.10 ni...@freebsd.org (Deprecate 2016-08-20)
>> >py-sqlalchemy08 0.8.7 ni...@freebsd.org
>> >
On Wed, 18 May 2016 08:02:59 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> The state of the SQLAlchemy ports currently in the tree is pretty dire.
> SQLAlchemy is perhaps the premiere ORM written in Python and we really
> should have decent support for it. Plus I know of at least two new as
>
