Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Is expected, but if somebody are not using portmaster or portupgrade,
simple upgrade of jpeg will break other ports and I think that in the
case of jpeg (widely used library) there will be a lot of users asking
"why my app XYZ is not working anymore".
A "simple upgrade"
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:05, 000.fbsd@ wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
rebuildet first?
I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof port
reinstalling.
Actually that's n
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:51:24 -0800
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 2/6/2010 1:53 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> > And in my case, I use portmaster, rebuilding of QT33 and arts
> > doesn't work and I screw many applications. Thank you for your hard
> > work but I don't know why is a rush for something which doesn't
>
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 15:53:57 -0600
ajtiM wrote:
> On Saturday 06 February 2010 15:36:22 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
> > >
> > > Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> > >> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESS
On 2/6/2010 12:52 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Excessive documentation is not any more helpful than no
> documentation. I would think it's relatively common sense to rebuild
> all applications that depend upon a library,
When that library bumps the major version, yes. If not, it's rarely
necess
On 2/6/2010 1:53 PM, ajtiM wrote:
> And in my case, I use portmaster, rebuilding of QT33 and arts doesn't work
> and
> I screw many applications. Thank you for your hard work but I don't know why
> is a rush for something which doesn't work?
I'm sorry to hear that you had problems with portmast
On Saturday 06 February 2010 17:47:05 Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:53:57PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> > I don't know why is a rush for something which doesn't work?
>
> All the individual package builds were tested on our 'clean' build
> environment (pointyhat.freebsd.org). portmgr
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:53:57PM -0600, ajtiM wrote:
> I don't know why is a rush for something which doesn't work?
All the individual package builds were tested on our 'clean' build
environment (pointyhat.freebsd.org). portmgr wouldn't have approved
the commit otherwise.
We can't test every u
My solution I work witho about 50 freebsd servers, is
to setup ONE server for each type (7.2,8.0) and install all the
ports I need..
Than using rsync I export
the /var/db/ports, /var/db/portsnap, /usr/ports (excluding
distfiles,packages, and work dirs)...
Than I use rsync and portsnap -PP -aBd
On Saturday 06 February 2010 15:36:22 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
> >
> > Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> >> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> On 06/02/2010 09:40, Hein
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
rebuildet first
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
> Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
>
>> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
>> >
>> >> Shouldn't th
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100
Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> >
> >> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
> >> rebuildet fir
Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
rebuildet first?
I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof port
reinstalling.
Actually that's
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:42:09PM -0500, jhell wrote:
>
> I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred this
> type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made
>
> Guess that doesn't stand for everything.
>
As other people have already pointed out, the freeze itself
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be
> rebuildet first?
>
> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof port
> reinstalling.
Actually that's not necessary in
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:25:42 +0300
> cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
>
>> Hi there.
>> I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
>> reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can
>> anybody shed the light what was changed? Thanks.
>
>
06.02.2010 01:50, Erik Trulsson пишет:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi there.
I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can
anybody shed the light what was changed?
The
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 23:24, bf1783@ wrote:
jhell wrote:
I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred this
type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made
Guess that doesn't stand for everything.
That freeze won't start until around Feb. 8, as announced. The jpeg
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 22:59, mezz7@ wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:42:09 -0600, jhell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi there.
I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
reason of it (
jhell wrote:
>I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred this
>type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was made
>
>Guess that doesn't stand for everything.
That freeze won't start until around Feb. 8, as announced. The jpeg
changes were announced earlier by the main
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:42:09 -0600, jhell wrote:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi there.
I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.o
Hi,
jhell wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
> >> Fetching 4282 patches.
>
> I could have swore that I recently heard an announcement that barred this
> type of activity until after 7.3-RELEASE was ma
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:50, ertr1013@ wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi there.
I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can
anybody shed the light what was changed?
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 06:25:42PM +0300, cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
> Hi there.
> I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
> reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can
> anybody shed the light what was changed?
The graphics/jpeg port was updated suc
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:25:42 +0300
cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
> Hi there.
> I see some massive port update in past hours, but not see what the
> reason of it (nor on freebsd-ports@, nor on freshports.org). Can
> anybody shed the light what was changed? Thanks.
New version of jpeg included a sh lib
26 matches
Mail list logo
