Sorry I'm little unused to mailinglists, and in mutt I have to cc
manually
- Forwarded message from Aldis Berjoza -
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:11:45 +0200
From: Aldis Berjoza
To: Scot Hetzel
Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org packages
* Scot Hetzel [26.11.2009. @04:39:19 -0600]:
>
Quoting Gary Kline :
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:19AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
> > JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
>
>
>
> Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 04:39:19AM -0600, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On 11/26/09, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
> > > JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
> >
> >
> >
> > Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to find and
>
On 11/26/09, Gary Kline wrote:
> > Looks like all the OpenOffice ports have a line like this:
> > JAVA_VENDOR=freebsd bsdjava openjdk
>
>
>
> Okay, so what does this mean I'm going to have to find and
> build from java-land from Sun? Anything??
>
>
It defines which jav
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > >
> > > If it depended on OpenJDK by default it wouldn't be a problem. I do not
> > > know whether i
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:04:01 -0800
Gary Kline wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
> > > Mark Linimon wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> > >>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:25:59PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
> > Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> >>> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> >>>
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
> Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>>> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
>>> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>> OpenOffice is one of o
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:01:19 -0600
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> > I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> > OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>
> OpenOffice is one of our most complex packages, a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
>> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
>> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>
There are packages available at the FreeBSD porting page
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Aldis Berjoza wrote:
> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
OpenOffice is one of our most complex packages, and, depending on which
package node it builds on, can take nearly a
On 24/11/09 13:46 +, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/11/23 Aldis Berjoza :
> > I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> > OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
> >
> > Everyone have them, even OpenBSD. What's the reason?
> >
> > OpenBSD even have package for lame.
2009/11/23 Aldis Berjoza :
> I and some other FreeBSD users are wondering why there are no
> OpenOffice.org package available on FreeBSD Mirrors?
>
> Everyone have them, even OpenBSD. What's the reason?
>
> OpenBSD even have package for lame.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Kindly provided by Glen Barber
13 matches
Mail list logo
