Re: OpenBSD's spamd.

2006-12-16 Thread Christopher Hilton
Peter Matulis wrote: [ snip ] my secondary MX is a FreeBSD box with no such protection and I fear that the spammers will just take advantage of the fact that my secondary MX has weaker protections than my primary. Yes, best practice is to configure all MX servers in the same way. Especial

Re: OpenBSD's spamd.

2006-12-16 Thread Peter Matulis
--- Christopher Hilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone gotten a newer version of OpenBSD's spamd than the one in > ports going? I'm cvsupping my ports tree now but since I didn't see > an > update on the cvs server I'm assuming 3.7 is the latest version. > > Between OpenBSD 3.7 and 3.8