Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-03 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
FAKE_MAKEARGS?= ${MAKE_ARGS} ${DESTDIRNAME}=${FAKE_DESTDIR} in this bsd.fake.mk DESTDIRNAME= DESTDIR normally all ./configure/gmake/gmake install supports DESTIR during the gmake install gmake install is replaced by gmake DESTFIR=$FAKE_DESTDIR} install which does the job well. but there

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-02 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Mon, 31.08.2009 at 23:26:43 +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the > fakeroot implementation from midnightbsd ports. > > In my first implementation the fake directory was enabled by default, no > ports had to be modified

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Fucking gmail, I replyed in private instead of the list so here is the reply, sorry > That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from > some work I've been doing in Debian. > > Currently the fakeroot is not something like the debian fakeroot, ie it is just a directory that i

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:02:24AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: [snip] > This is done either for very, very simple programs where it would be > unnecessary overhead to recurse into the upstream's Makefile and run > its "install" target, or for programs where the upstream doesn't even > *have* an "i

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi, > > I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the > fakeroot implementation from midnightbsd ports. That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from some work I've been doing in D