Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > fstat(1) does much of what lsof does. >> > > I'll be damned; so it does... Thanks! > As well as procstat -f -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 11:59:26AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > fstat(1) does much of what lsof does. > > I'll be damned; so it does... Thanks! As maintainer of sysutils/lsof, the major thing is cross-platform compatibility. That said, Vic Abell

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: fstat(1) does much of what lsof does. I'll be damned; so it does... Thanks! -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Doug Hardie
> On 27 December 2017, at 16:05, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 27 December 2017, at 13:26, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > >> [...] Putting header files into the port is a non-starter as they MUST

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 27 December 2017, at 13:26, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > >> [...] Putting header files into the port is a non-starter as they MUST > match the kernel on which lsof is built. I added lsof to

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Doug Hardie
> On 27 December 2017, at 13:26, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> [...] Putting header files into the port is a non-starter as they MUST match >> the kernel on which lsof is built. I added lsof to PORTS_MODULES so it is >> rebuilt with any new kernel on m

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: [...] Putting header files into the port is a non-starter as they MUST match the kernel on which lsof is built. I added lsof to PORTS_MODULES so it is rebuilt with any new kernel on my stable system and on one release system so I can use that package t

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-27 Thread Julian Elischer
On 27/12/17 7:14 am, Dave Horsfall wrote: aneurin# freebsd-version 10.4-RELEASE-p5 aneurin# which lsof /usr/local/sbin/lsof aneurin# lsof > /dev/null lsof: WARNING: compiled for FreeBSD release 10.3-RELEASE-p22; this is 10.4-RELEASE-p3. aneurin# pkg upgrade lsof Updating FreeBSD repository cata

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-26 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Binary packages are built on the oldest supported 10.x release, which >> currently is 10.3. I think that lsof is just one of the few programs that >> care about this, and show a warning. This

Re: Of LSOF

2017-12-26 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Dimitry Andric wrote: Binary packages are built on the oldest supported 10.x release, which currently is 10.3. I think that lsof is just one of the few programs that care about this, and show a warning. This is probably because lsof pokes around in half-documented (or un