Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4_1

2012-07-15 Thread ajtiM
On Saturday 14 July 2012 15:29:53 Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-07-14 21:18, Warren Block wrote:> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote: > > I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update > > LibreOffice > > > >>> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1

Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4_1

2012-07-14 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-14 21:18, Warren Block wrote:> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote: > I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update > LibreOffice >>> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1. >>> FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0

Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4_1

2012-07-14 Thread ajtiM
On Saturday 14 July 2012 14:18:42 Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 > > Release and it shows me to update LibreOffice > > > >> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1. > >> FreeBSD 9.0

Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4_1

2012-07-14 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update LibreOffice 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1. FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0 and I didn't have a problem to build LibreOffice 3.5

Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4_1

2012-07-14 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update LibreOffice > 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1. > FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0 and I didn't have a problem to build > LibreOffice 3.5.4. Do I need this update? Is it not po