Hello, h.
You wrote 25 сентября 2011 г., 18:40:06:
> I see this, too. Turns out my cvsup mirror is broken. It doesn't have
> LDFLAGS commit r1.696 for ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v while it has r1.86 for
> ports/devel/dbus/Makefile,v. After using different mirror the issue is
> gone away.
Yep, it looks
* Lev Serebryakov (l...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> > The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> > similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> > altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
> Add devel/dbus-glib to the list...
> Should I make formal PR for all these ports
Lev Serebryakov writes:
> Hello, Dmitry.
> You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
>
>> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
>> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
>> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
>
> devel/dbus could not be built with this co
Hello, Erik.
You wrote 25 сентября 2011 г., 14:49:19:
>> > The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
>> > similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
>> > altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
>> Add devel/dbus-glib to the list...
>> Should I make formal PR for
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 02:41:36PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Dmitry.
> You wrote 24 2011 ??., 3:36:14:
>
> > The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> > similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> > altered by += like C/CXXFL
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
Add devel/dbus-glib to the list...
Should I make formal PR for all these port
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
devel/dbus could not be built with this commit, too:
checking for pkg-config..
Hello, Dmitry.
You wrote 24 сентября 2011 г., 3:36:14:
> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
This commit breaks building `databases/sqlite3' with ICU support:
command line
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:36:14AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
>
> The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
> similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
> altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
>
Thanks you very mu
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch was committed, LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS and now handled
similarily, shouldn't be passed to CONFIGURE_ENV and should be
altered by += like C/CXXFLAGS.
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch is ready:
http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/ldflags.patch
While it's mostly a bunch of similar changes, I'd like community
eyes on specific important parts, namely Mk/ changes, python and
ruby and generally all := assigns of *FLAGS, as these
11 matches
Mail list logo
