On Wed, May 02, 2007, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:45PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > All backed out.
> >
> > Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
> > reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
> > strong opposition a
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:06:45PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> All backed out.
>
> Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
> reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
> strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continue that.
>
Harald Schmalzbauer escribió:
Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2007 schrieb Andrey Chernov:
All backed out.
Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continu
All backed out.
Not because I admit they are technically wrong and not because of bug
reports (I receive nothing). But because I surprisingly meets so
strong opposition and resistance so lost any desire to continue that.
Anyone who interested in POSIX can dig out what changes and how
through cvs
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:39:35AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> All functions in subj. now conforms to Open Group specs and POSIX.
> I believe I fix all obsoleted and hack places in our tree which uses
> old behaviour. The ports system is under consideration.
>
> Please send any problems you'll
