Carlos A. M. dos Santos writes:
> BTW, I strongly believe that we, FreeBSD users, would be doing
> ourselves a big favour by using -- and helping to improve -- open
> source software that run natively on FreeBSD. Foreign options may
> work here and there but using them will ever be playing ca
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Frank Jahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:53 +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
>> On 09/13/08 16:56, Frank Jahnke wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
>> >> Peter Jeremy <
On 09/13/08 16:56, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
>> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Recentry, wine is good solution for using Flash.
>
> I use this too.
So you use wine + windows_firef
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 08:53 +0200, Tobias Roth wrote:
> On 09/13/08 16:56, Frank Jahnke wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> >> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
> >> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Recentry, wine is good solution for usin
On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 23:51 +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recentry, wine is good solution for using Flash.
I use this too.
I'm going to cut the rest of the comment about whether lpw can be saved
or no
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:23:37 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-Sep-12 22:00:49 -0300, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
> >linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
> Unfortuna
On 2008-Sep-12 22:00:49 -0300, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
>linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
Unfortunately, nspluginwrapper is not a general replacement for
linuxpluginwrapper - it is mi
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:00 -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since
> linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project.
>
I agree, and have been using nspw for quite some time. Still, if lpw
remains in the ports tree, it ought
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Frank Jahnke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I updated my ports tree today, and a portsdb failed owing to
> linuxpluginwrapper. This seems to be because acroread7 is no longer in
> the ports tree, so the update fails. acroread7 is indeed in the
> makefile. You may w
