On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 08:06:36 +1200
Jonathan Chen wrote:
> It's always safer to build ports/packages using one of the newer
> builders, ie: poudriere or synth. These builders ensure that the build
> environment is clean and avoids cross contamination from other
> installed ports. If poudriere is to
On 7 September 2017 at 07:51, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:27:32 +0200
> Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>> My testbuild on 11.1a in poudriere was sucessful. Can you try to
>> build in poudriere ?
>
> No.
> I remove zfs and jail from system.
>
>
>> Building on a box where some packages are alr
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:27:32 +0200
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> My testbuild on 11.1a in poudriere was sucessful. Can you try to
> build in poudriere ?
No.
I remove zfs and jail from system.
> Building on a box where some packages are already installed can lead
> to broken builds.
>
> See Jan's comme
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:27:35 -0500
Matthew Donovan wrote:
> Well it's an upstream bug. So port maintainer is not the issue. It's
> being worked after n looks like simple fix per upstream bug report.
>
At least for graphics/libdrm amdgpu is option.
And maintainer can add OS version check and aut
Well it's an upstream bug. So port maintainer is not the issue. It's being
worked after n looks like simple fix per upstream bug report.
On Sep 6, 2017 1:31 PM, "Rozhuk Ivan" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Why commiters ignory FreeBSD 11.x users!?
>
> graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build: https://bugs.fr
Hi!
> Why commiters ignory FreeBSD 11.x users!?
>
> graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222098
> graphics/libdrm update to 2.4.83,1 failed ('uve_ib.h' file not found):
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221881
My testbui
