On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 1:01 PM Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> > > > Hi freebsd-ports@,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
> On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> > > Hi freebsd-ports@,
> > >
> > > I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports:
> Thanks, Neel!
> > [s
On 3/28/20 5:33 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote:
Hi freebsd-ports@,
I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports:
Thanks, Neel!
[snip]
net/librsync2
sysutils/ioping
sysutils/pick
Hi,
If no one has already stepped up, I'd
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> Hi freebsd-ports@,
>
> I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports:
>
[snip]
> net/librsync2
> sysutils/ioping
> sysutils/pick
Hi,
If no one has already stepped up, I'd like to try my hand at maintaining
these three
Thanks for all your hard work Neel!
On Friday, March 27, 2020, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> Hi freebsd-ports@,
>
> I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports:
>
> databases/py-mysqlclient
> deskutils/go-for-it
> devel/grpc
> devel/libnsutils
> devel/libparserutils
> devel/netsurf-build
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:35:44PM -0700, Neel Chauhan wrote:
> Hi freebsd-ports@,
>
> I would like to drop maintainership for the following Ports:
>
> databases/py-mysqlclient
> deskutils/go-for-it
> devel/grpc
> devel/libnsutils
> devel/libparserutils
> devel/netsurf-buildsystem
> devel/nsgenbi
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 10:01:48PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'd like to take maintainership of
>
> astro/xearth
> textproc/urlview
done.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 04:13:37PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote:
> >> If no one else wants to maintain them, please reset the maintainer of the
> >> following ports to po...@freebsd.org:
> >>
> >
> > I'm interesting in maintaing of this ports:
> >
> >> multimedia/gpodder
> >> sysutils/rdup
> >
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/2/11 3:55 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Hi!
> So can pleas anybody assign me as maintainer for this ports?
>
> Исходное сообщение ----
> Тема: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
> Дата: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 0
03.05.2011 00:13, Greg Larkin пишет:
multimedia/gpodder
sysutils/rdup
Hi Ruslan,
I just assigned those ports to you. Thank you for volunteering!
Cheers,
Greg
Thank you, Greg!
--
Regards,
Ruslan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Hi!
So can pleas anybody assign me as maintainer for this ports?
Исходное сообщение
Тема: Re: Dropping maintainership of my ports
Дата: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:12:54 +0400
От: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Кому: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет:
Well, due
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:23:23AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Maybe, if maintainer can "somehow easily" become ports committer,
> this hurdle might be lower ?
This has been discussed before. The barrier to entry is currently set
at the "seems to be willing to work on FreeBSD over a period of man
Eitan Adler wrote:
> > I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons
> > to save any unmaintained port,
>
> What you have been told is "no-one steps up to (a) fix the
> problem, (b) take maintainership and (c) _continue_ with
> maintainership ...
>
> If you are stepping up to do the wor
On 27 April 2011 13:54, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports
>> features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a
>> "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if it is
>> formatted badly (b) test it in a tinde
Eitan Adler wrote:
> There is a lot of work that has to be done in the background even if
> no new ports are added. Things like the gmake upgrade and new ports
> features take a lot of time. Furthermore adding a port seems to be a
> "trivial" task, however the committers have to (a) fix it up if
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:35:58AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200
> Erik Trulsson articulated:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> > > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote:
> > > >
...
> > >
> > > Every response from t
> So, if the maintainers of the small leaf ports would be able
> to commit their work themselves, it would free the ports committers
> with the large ports projects on their hands to work on those ?
>
> Would this work ?
If you look through this list's archives I actually proposed this idea
myself
Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> > Then you have misunderstood things. I don't think anybody would be
> > unhappy if you (or anybody else) took maintainership of one or more of
> > the currently unmaintained ports.
>
> > There are two things. Becoming a
If after this thread you still want to drop maintership I'd like the following:
>>> deskutils/teapot
>>> math/ised
>>> security/ccrypt
>>> sysutils/moreutils
>>> sysutils/moreutils-parallel
>> I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any
> unmaintained port,
What you have b
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:49:58 +0200
Erik Trulsson articulated:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> > On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote:
> > >
> > >You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports
> > >wasn't met with enthusiasm.
Hi!
> > No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the
> > committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the
> > ports I might identify as "popular", because it would interfere with
> > their plans to trim the portstree.
> Then you have misunderstood th
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote:
> >
> >You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports
> >wasn't met with enthusiasm.
> >
>
> No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that ma
On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 23:27:40 PDT John Marino wrote:
You're just sulking because your idea of identifying popular ports
wasn't met with enthusiasm.
No, it's more than that. I got the distinct impression that many of the
committers would be unhappy if I took maintainership of some of the
p
On 4/27/2011 8:09 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
I've been told that we shouldn't be looking for reasons to save any
unmaintained port, and I was specifically told this in response to my
efforts to identify ports that have a lot of users. So I don't think
current policy supports the conclusion that
sorry for the top post, but shouolder is killing me.
idea 1: can the 'summer of code' guys help us out with this.
idea 2. why oh why can we not live with the fbsd and debian
paradigm?
the reason i've kept my domain here at home is because i like the
flexibility i see. but keeping ports curren
On Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 22:15:58 PDT Zhihao Yuan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these
deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further
discussion, I don't think I can continue working with t
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
>
> Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these
> deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further
> discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers.
> So I'm stepping down.
>
> If no o
27.04.2011 05:43, Charlie Kester пишет:
Well, due to some serious philosophical differences re these
deprecation campaigns and what seems to be resistance to any further
discussion, I don't think I can continue working with the committers.
So I'm stepping down.
If no one else wants to maintain
On 9/28/10 2:34 AM, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
>
>> On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote:
>>> x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more
>>
>> I use this and can take maintainership.
>
> You have been set as
On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote:
>> x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more
>
> I use this and can take maintainership.
You have been set as the maintainer.
Thanks!
On Mon 27 Sep 2010 at 12:32:56 PDT Tobias Roth wrote:
x11/fbpanel : Desktop panel with taskbar, pager, launchbar and more
I use this and can take maintainership.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Sep 27, 2010, at 4:23 PM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> 27.09.2010 23:32, Tobias Roth пишет:
>> Hi
>>
>> I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus
>> dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and
>> take over maintainership, please send me an
27.09.2010 23:32, Tobias Roth пишет:
Hi
I haven't been using FreeBSD as a desktop for a while now, and am thus
dropping maintainerships of my ports. If anyone wants to step up and
take over maintainership, please send me an email. For everything left
over, I will send PRs to reset the maintainer
33 matches
Mail list logo
