Re: Compiling for i386 on amd64 using tinderbox

Gabor PALI wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Christopher Key > wrote: > > Setting ARCH, UNAME_m and UNAME_n [..] did the trick.  I wonder if > > tinderbox should instead be setting these values automatically [..] > > Ask/request it on the Tinderbox mailing list :) Or even better, send p

Re: Compiling for i386 on amd64 using tinderbox

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Christopher Key wrote: > Setting ARCH, UNAME_m and UNAME_n [..] did the trick.  I wonder if tinderbox > should instead be setting these values automatically [..] Ask/request it on the Tinderbox mailing list :) :g ___ f

Re: Compiling for i386 on amd64 using tinderbox

> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Christopher Key > wrote: > >/ patch uname to return the appropriate answer /> > I do not think you will need this since answers returned by uname(1) > can be customized easily, just check its manual page t

Re: Compiling for i386 on amd64 using tinderbox

Hej, On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Christopher Key wrote: > patch uname to return the appropriate answer I do not think you will need this since answers returned by uname(1) can be customized easily, just check its manual page to see how to do that. Cheers, :g ___