On 3/2/2010 4:44 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Pursuing diffs on re-rolled sources might be nice, but Doug, after
> you also refused to allow ports to flag installs of binaries not
> built from fetched sources ? ... Balance seems missing !
I didn't "refuse" anything, I have no actual authority. :)
Doug Barton wrote:
> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
> update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.
> On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> >> On 24.02.2010 02:45, We
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:29:05 -0600, Doug Barton wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
I've removed all the conversations from homebank author after patch
from this PR was commited ). But he is released the new version (4.2.1)
after i ask him if distfile was rerolled. Latte
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
I've removed all the conversations from homebank author after patch from this
PR was commited ). But he is released the new version (4.2.1) after i ask him
if distfile was rerolled. Latter he is addmitted that reroll was the bad
idea.
There is
On 26.02.2010 00:37, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote:
I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one
that matches the current disti
On 02/24/10 09:31, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>> On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote:
I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one
that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has.
>
On 24.02.2010 20:31, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote:
I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one
that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has.
I don't
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:25:39PM +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote:
> >> I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one
> >> that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has.
> >
> > I don't have one but QAT may. Hopeful
On 24.02.2010 02:45, Wesley Shields wrote:
I asked for someone to send me a copy of the original tarball, the one
that matches the current distinfo file. So far no one has.
I don't have one but QAT may. Hopefully itectu@ can confirm or deny
that.
-- WXS
4.2.1 was released.
http://www.freebsd
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:09:53PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> > On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> >>> Hi.
> >>>
> >>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
> >>
> >> Th
On 24.02.2010 00:09, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi.
I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
That's fine, but our process mandates that any committ
On 02/23/10 00:18, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
>>
>> That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
>> updat
On 15.02.2010 00:58, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi.
I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.
Doug
So
On 02/14/10 13:56, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Hi.
I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
That's fine, but our process mandates that any committer who makes the
update needs to verify the diff between the two tarballs.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit
Hi.
I've contacted the author. It confirm that it was rerrolled:
==
Hi,
It is intentional, done by myself to fix a problem into the package.
Regards,
Max.
- Mail Original -
De: "Ruslan Mahmatkhanov"
À: homeb...@free.
On 02/14/10 03:46, hanno Krusken wrote:
Hi there,
since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD
port/finance/homebank-4.2"
see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2
Does anyone have the old distfile (the one corresponding to what's
currently in the po
On 14.02.2010 14:46, hanno Krusken wrote:
Hi there,
since the last upgrade there is a "Checksum mismatch for FBSD
port/finance/homebank-4.2"
see my log file from portupgrade running FreeBSD-8.0-releng-p2
===> Cleaning for homebank-4.2
===> Found saved configuration for homebank-4.1
=>
17 matches
Mail list logo
