Re: Bacula 9.2.1 fails on 10.4:

2018-09-03 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 29/08/2018 19:59, Dan Langille wrote: On Aug 29, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Jason E. Hale wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:42 PM Dan Langille wrote: On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:26 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: Dan Langille wrote: Why would Bacula 9.2.1 compile on 11.2 but fail on 10.4? The error is: bsock

Re: Bacula 9.2.1 fails on 10.4:

2018-08-29 Thread Dan Langille
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Jason E. Hale wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:42 PM Dan Langille wrote: >> >>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:26 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: >>> >>> Dan Langille wrote: Why would Bacula 9.2.1 compile on 11.2 but fail on 10.4? The error is: bsock.c:439:20:

Re: Bacula 9.2.1 fails on 10.4:

2018-08-27 Thread Dan Langille
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:26 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > Dan Langille wrote: >> Why would Bacula 9.2.1 compile on 11.2 but fail on 10.4? >> The error is: >> bsock.c:439:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ENODATA' >> The complete build logs are at the following URLs. Can you see the cause. >> 1

Re: Bacula 9.2.1 fails on 10.4:

2018-08-27 Thread Yuri Pankov
Dan Langille wrote: Why would Bacula 9.2.1 compile on 11.2 but fail on 10.4? The error is: bsock.c:439:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ENODATA' The complete build logs are at the following URLs. Can you see the cause. 11.2: https://services.unixathome.org/poudriere/data/112amd64-def