Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

2020-03-17 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 2020-03-17 02:16, Dan McGrath wrote: Hi, Just a heads up that I also had bug report #243609 [1] open on this that I guess can/should be closed now. Thanks to all. This is good news. bye av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

2020-03-16 Thread Dan McGrath
Hi, Just a heads up that I also had bug report #243609 [1] open on this that I guess can/should be closed now. Dan [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243609 On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:57 AM Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 15/03/20 18:09,

Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

2020-03-16 Thread Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports
On 15/03/20 18:09, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'm using security/swatch to look *in real time* for specific strings in > my logs, but now it's deprecated because it's unfetchable. > > Can someone suggest an alternative? > > N.B. I'm not looking for something that will parse logs at spe

Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

2020-03-15 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:26:53 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-03-15 18:16, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > swatch is still available as a new version on sourceforge (3.2.4). > > Hmm... > From the port, website is here: > > http://swatch.sourceforge.net/ > Nothing to download, it seems

Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

2020-03-15 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 2020-03-15 18:16, Michael Gmelin wrote: swatch is still available as a new version on sourceforge (3.2.4). Hmm... From the port, website is here: http://swatch.sourceforge.net/ Nothing to download, it seems, from there. There's also: https://sourceforge.net/p/swatch/ It was last updated

Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

2020-03-15 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 15. Mar 2020, at 18:10, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > Hello. > > I'm using security/swatch to look *in real time* for specific strings in my > logs, but now it's deprecated because it's unfetchable. > > Can someone suggest an alternative? > > N.B. I'm not looking for something that will