Vivek Khera píše v st 13. 06. 2007 v 10:26 -0400:
> personally, I'm annoyed by ports that use OPTIONS because I cannot
> then set them globally in my make.conf file (which is copied around
> to all my servers). I have to ensure that the proper OPTIONS are set
> on every machine on which I m
2007/6/9, Benjamin Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:36, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if
> they would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
>
> 1. An ./options-descr file in the port directory that describes
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you
feel annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS
(because nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free t
Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
>> First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you feel
>> annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS (because
>> nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to submit
On Jun 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
First there where no OPTIONS, then OPTIONS was introduced. If you
feel annoyed by those ports which are not converted yet to OPTIONS
(because nobody felt annoyed enough to convert them), feel free to
submit patches for them.
persona
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 00:36:58 Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Gabor Tjong A Hung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 12
>
> Jun 2007 17:26:35 +0200):
> > As it is now some ports don't even have OPTIONS, and you need to define
> > variables to "define" your options. I don't really understand wh
Quoting Gabor Tjong A Hung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 12
Jun 2007 17:26:35 +0200):
As it is now some ports don't even have OPTIONS, and you need to define
variables to "define" your options. I don't really understand why this is
done this way, but this is equally annoying.
First there wh
As it is now some ports don't even have OPTIONS, and you need to define
variables to "define" your options. I don't really understand why this is
done this way, but this is equally annoying.
On 6/11/07, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:33:17PM +0200, Kirill Pon
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:33:17PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:36:51AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if they
> > would
> > consider the merits/demerits of adding:
> >
> > 1. An ./optio
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:36:51AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if they would
> consider the merits/demerits of adding:
>
> 1. An ./options-descr file in the port directory that describes the options,
> their purpose and
On Saturday 09 June 2007 13:33:17 you wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:36:51AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if they
> > would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
> >
> > 1. An ./options-descr file in the port dir
On Saturday 09 June 2007 11:20:21 Benjamin Lutz wrote:
> On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:36, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if
> > they would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
> >
> > 1. An ./options-descr file in the port dir
On Saturday 09 June 2007 18:36, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Would it be possible , when a port has options, to ask porters if
> they would consider the merits/demerits of adding:
>
> 1. An ./options-descr file in the port directory that describes the
> options, their purpose and any notes abo
13 matches
Mail list logo
