On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:22:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> A simple grep of the tree shows at least 644 more uses of USE_GNOME=
> pkgconfig, including some in bsd.xorg.mk.
>
> Is work being undertaken to fix these, or have they been left as is on
> purpose?
>
Yes on purpose because of the la
A simple grep of the tree shows at least 644 more uses of USE_GNOME=
pkgconfig, including some in bsd.xorg.mk.
Is work being undertaken to fix these, or have they been left as is on
purpose?
The fact that bsd.xorg.mk already pulls in USE_GNOME=pkgconfig in the
right places also suggests that it w
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:27:21PM -0700, Russell Jackson wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 11:12 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > We just switched devel/pkg-config to devel/pkgconf for that reason (see
> > UPDATING for instructions)
>
> The content of the files in the new pkgconf port are "doubled up".
>
On 07/25/2012 11:12 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
We just switched devel/pkg-config to devel/pkgconf for that reason (see
UPDATING for instructions)
The content of the files in the new pkgconf port are "doubled up".
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/pkgconf/Makefile?revision=301539&vi
On 07/25/2012 23:26, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> Sorry, I meant of course the Makefile of the new devel/pkgconf :)
Actually every file in the port was duplicated. I just fixed it since
this is a pretty important thing to NOT have broken.
--
Change is hard.
___
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
>> solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
>>
>> Let's first start with t
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have two problems with devel/pkg-config, the first one is hopefully now
> solved, the second one is in the slow way to be solved.
>
> Let's first start with the first one:
>
> 1/ since 0.26 devel/pkg-config expects pkg-con
