Michel Talon wrote on 04.09.2011 11:29:
Ruslan wrote:
Hi, i maintain port (sysutils/rdup) that is failing with clang:
I have looked at the problem, it is indeed in rdup source. If you look
at rdup git history for rdup-tr.c you will see
remove rdup_entry_c from the code, totally unnee
Ivan Klymenko wrote on 04.09.2011 11:12:
В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:42:07 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
Hi!
Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The
results can be seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-erro
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 12:22:35 +0200
Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 04.09.2011 10:45, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> > В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:34:33 +0200
> > Matthias Andree пишет:
> >
> >> Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> >>
> >>> Maybe this will help:
> >>> *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
> >>
>
Am 04.09.2011 10:48, schrieb Mark Linimon:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:09:05AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> Can you advise which value of __FreeBSD_version to use? The official
>> list at
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html
>> does n
Am 04.09.2011 10:45, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:34:33 +0200
> Matthias Andree пишет:
>
>> Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
>>
>>> Maybe this will help:
>>> *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
>>
>> This is just guessing and probably triggers the same warning unless
>> it's v
В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:34:33 +0200
Matthias Andree пишет:
> Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
>
> > Maybe this will help:
> > *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
>
> This is just guessing and probably triggers the same warning unless
> it's volatile.
>
> Have the original author look at it.
T
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:09:05AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Can you advise which value of __FreeBSD_version to use? The official
> list at
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html
> does not have a reference from what I can see.
There is
Am 04.09.2011 08:42, schrieb Ruslan Mahmatkhanov:
> Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The
>> results can be
>> seen here:
>>
>>
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>>
Am 04.09.2011 09:12, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> Maybe this will help:
> *rdup_entry = *rdup_entry;
This is just guessing and probably triggers the same warning unless it's
volatile.
Have the original author look at it.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili
Am 04.09.2011 05:09, schrieb Gerald Pfeifer:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does
>> that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC. I think the bug is in
>> ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are ne
В Sun, 04 Sep 2011 10:42:07 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov пишет:
> Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The
> > results can be seen here:
> >
> >
> > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.2
Ruslan wrote:
> Hi, i maintain port (sysutils/rdup) that is failing with clang:
I have looked at the problem, it is indeed in rdup source. If you look
at rdup git history for rdup-tr.c you will see
remove rdup_entry_c from the code, totally unneeded
in this modification, the line
rdup
Roman Divacky wrote on 25.07.2011 19:59:
Hi!
Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can
be
seen here:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that
un
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does
> that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC. I think the bug is in
> ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are newer clang-based
> 9-CURRENT systems without gcc.
>
Am 25.07.2011 17:59, schrieb Roman Divacky:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
>
> Since the last run we've managed to fix
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:06 PM, George Liaskos wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I added some jquery for sorting / searching at the latest clang exp run.
> http://cybertron.gr/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/index.html
>
> I hope you 'll find it useful.
The table should be sortable already, j
Hi--
On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
> qt4-webkit seems to trigger a clang bug, but the description for clang
> bug only says "See (TBA) for further information". Is there anything we
> (
Roman Divacky writes:
> Hi!
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
qt4-webkit seems to trigger a clang bug, but the description for clang
bug only say
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
>
> Since the last run we've managed to fix the
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:59:20PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results
> can be
> seen here:
>
>
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
>
It would be good to also
20 matches
Mail list logo
