Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Chip Camden wrote: > lang/ghc is still marked IGNORE, unless I'm missing something. Yes, if your system is older than 6.0 on i386 and older then 7.0 on amd64, it is still ignored, since we do not support those platforms. Otherwise it must be okay. Cheers, g. ___

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:07:46PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300 > Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > > > > Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly > > lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. Th

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:14:20 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. > > Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly > lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected > in our -exp run because of being masked by other

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

A switch to use newer GMP version has been committed. Unfortunately lang/ghc and dependent ports (and possibly lang/gnat-gcc44) were broken by this. The brokenness wasn't detected in our -exp run because of being masked by other issues. It will take a few days to fix lang/ghc. I'm still investi

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Garrett Cooper skrev 2010-04-19 09:28: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating pa

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:25:06 +0200 Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? As written in my previous two or three mails on the subject, for now yes. Xorg is in the second phase of testing, and the rest are waitgin for it. I can't give a firm ETA yet. --

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > > It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? http://ragingred.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/simpsons_are-we-there-yet.jpg In short, sorry... nope (there's still some ways to go on updating packages -- porters have hit some snags wit

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

It's now more than 10 days. Are ports stable now? Thanks /Leslie ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

iginal ETA can we get a current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Cc: sta...@freebsd.org, questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstab

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 04:38:28PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Hi, > > > As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports > are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 > April. I didn't see any mial, but figured I'd check. Are ports still unsta

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

current status report? Is the portstree > considered stable again, and if not, what's the revised ETA? From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Cc: sta...@freebsd.org, questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days Date: Mon

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun 28 Mar 2010 at 06:38:28 PDT Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Hi, As announced before, a few big commits, that touch some thousands ports are being done: png, curl, x11, gnome, kde4. The target ETA is 6-7 April. The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump),

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 2010-04-08 14:42, Antonio Olivares wrote: On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares wrote: [ .. ] ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> require

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:42:06 -0500, Antonio Olivares articulated: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu > wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 > > Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > >  [ .. ] > > > >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod > >>         ===>>> This

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:42:06AM -0500, Antonio Olivares wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 > > Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > >  [ .. ] > > > >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod > >>         ===>>> This por

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 > Antonio Olivares wrote: > >  [ .. ] > >> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod >>         ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE >>         ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:20:47 -0500 Antonio Olivares wrote: [ .. ] > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod > ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE > ===>>> requires the userland sources to be installed. Set > SRC_BASE if it is not in /usr/src > > ===>>> If

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Garret, I have tried the command out, but it apparently does not do the job: ===>>> Continuing 'make config' dependency check for graphics/graphviz ===>>> Launching child to update libgnomeui-2.24.1_1 jpeg-8_1 >> arts-1.5.10_2,1 >> jackit-0.116.2_2 >> devel/doxygen >> graphics/graphviz >>

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > Ion-Mihai, > > Does this fix the following issue? > > I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2 > >  I try to use konqueror and I get > >  There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror. >  The diagnostics i

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Ion-Mihai, Does this fix the following issue? I have installed FreeBSD 8.0 and updated it to current p2 I try to use konqueror and I get There was an error loading the module About-Page for Konqueror. The diagnostics is: Cannot load library /usr/local/kde4/lib/kde4/konq_aboutpage.so: (Shar

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Just a status update: PNG and cURL are in, and png fall-outs are believed to be fixed. Xorg update has gone through an -exp run on Pointy and our xorg team is working on fixing the approx. 60 ports with problems. I will begin -exp runs for Gnome and KDE updates tonight or tomorrow morning. Pac

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Le Dimanche 28 à 23:21, Frédéric Perrin a écrit : > Hello, > > emacs23 is also broken. The build fails when building temacs with: > > image.o(.text+0x65d3): In function `png_load': > : undefined reference to `png_check_sig' This was resolved with the off-list help of Warren Block, and with dinoe

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/29/10 12:21, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton > wrote: > > Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip > it internally in any case. > > > Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > Right, that will work, but the * isn't necessary. Portmaster will strip > it internally in any case. > Those type of examples in the man pages and UPDATING have never worked for me in tcsh, I've always had to glob it like Garret stated. > p

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Hi, sysutils/tracker-client fails in configure, fix to port's Makefile: --- sysutils/tracker-client/Makefile.orig 2010-03-29 20:59:36.0 +0200 +++ sysutils/tracker-client/Makefile2010-03-29 21:01:42.0 +0200 @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ INSTALLS_ICONS=yes USE_AUTOTOOLS= li

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/29/10 02:53, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Besides, when I read `glob' I don't think `regular expression'. A > glob is a simplified extension of regular expressions, I wasn't going for a rigorous definition here. :) However, "simplified" is the correct idea. > The previous method I described

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/29/10 02:27, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png >> That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port >> directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of >> that was (unfortunately) broken

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/2010 11:27, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:15:23 +0200 > Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >>> We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all >>> done, and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help >>> testi

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. graphics/inkscape needs a dependency fix. diff -Nur inkscape.orig/Makefile inkscape/Makefile --- inkscape

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote:  portmaster -r graphics/png >> >> That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port >> directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of >> that was

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/10 7:04 PM, Doug Barton wrote: portmaster -r graphics/png That won't work, the man page clearly says that it has to be a port directory or glob pattern from /var/db/pkg. The "glob pattern" bit of that was (unfortunately) broken up till version 2.20, which I just committed. I'm confu

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:15:23 +0200 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all > > done, and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help > > testing / fixing. > > The already committed graphics/im

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 03/28/10 19:34, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>> portmaster -r png- >> >> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just >> have missed it in the docs). >> >> I w

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. The already committed graphics/imlib2 patch does not work, i.e. it compiles, but png doesn't work, with thi

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Rene Ladan wrote: > 2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper : >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >>> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- >>> >>> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/2010 09:58, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, >> and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. > > Fix for graphics/evas-loader-png. Sorry, wrong patch.

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. Fix for graphics/evas-loader-png. diff -Nur evas-loader-png.orig/files/patch-src-modules-loaders-png-evas

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

2010/3/29 Garrett Cooper : > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> >>> portmaster -r png- >> >> Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just >> have missed it in the docs). >> >> I would have used

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 28/03/2010 15:38, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. A small fix for graphics/php5-gd. It builds without the patch, but doesn't work without it. diff -Nur php5

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Warren Block wrote: >> >> graphics/osg doesn't build: > > Patch for graphics/osg attached.  Builds but otherwise untested. Please stop > me before I patch again. Here's a fix for x11-fm/thunar . Thanks, -Garrett fix

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> >> portmaster -r png- > > Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just > have missed it in the docs). > > I would have used > >  portmaster -r graphics/png

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/10 1:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: portmaster -r png- Is that correct? I haven't seen that notation before (although I might just have missed it in the docs). I would have used portmaster -r graphics/png Ari -- --> Aristedes Maniatis ish http://www.ish.com

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: >> >> The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib >> version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. > > The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On 29/03/10 12:38 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: The first one was done, update of graphics/png (including a shared lib version bump), with about 5000 ports affected. The UPDATING entry for the png update looks very wrong. Wrong date, wrong text, wrong instructions for portmaster. 20090328: A

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Warren Block wrote: graphics/osg doesn't build: Patch for graphics/osg attached. Builds but otherwise untested. Please stop me before I patch again. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA--- src/osgPlugins/png/ReaderWriterPNG.cpp.orig 2010-03-28 16:40:42.

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Tim Kellers wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. We also have two i

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. We also have two incremental builds on

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Hello, emacs23 is also broken. The build fails when building temacs with: cc -nostdlib `./prefix-args -Xlinker -L/usr/local/lib -znocombreloc` -L/usr/local/lib -lintl -Wl,-znocombreloc -L/usr/local/lib -o temacs pre-crt0.o /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/crtbegin.o dispnew.o frame.o s

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:09:38 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built t

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:09:38 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > > http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built > > to find out if the problem hasn't

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. We also have two incremental builds on P

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. Could you put this in UPDATING, please? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildports&sort=last_built to find out if the problem hasn't already been reported or even fixed. We also have two incremental builds on P

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Oops. Sorry about sending out an empty message. Let me try again. Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. Mr. portmgr: Do you *want* help testing and fixing? ___

Re: [ HEADS UP ] Ports unstable for the next 10 days

Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > We do _NOT_ recommend updating ports until this commits are all done, > and the problems are fixed, except if you want to help testing / fixing. > > Before reporting failures, please take a look at ports@ list, and > http://qat.tecnik93.com/index.php?action=failed_buildp