On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 07:06:21PM +0530, Subhro wrote:
>
> I second that. I would really like to have a non devel port as well.
> However I believe 2 versions would be an overkill. The last but one
> should be a more feasible options.
The reason why there are two ports in the tree is the stable
I second that. I would really like to have a non devel port as well.
However I believe 2 versions would be an overkill. The last but one
should be a more feasible options.
Thanks
Subhro
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:58 AM, R
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Russell Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subhro wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I have managed to hit some race conditions in puppet. This has also
>> been reported here http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/ticket/831
>>
>> I would request you to kindly bump up th
Subhro wrote:
Greetings,
I have managed to hit some race conditions in puppet. This has also
been reported here http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/ticket/831
I would request you to kindly bump up the ports version so the problem
can be fixed. I have also verified that puppet-devel works fine.
Greetings,
I have managed to hit some race conditions in puppet. This has also
been reported here http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/ticket/831
I would request you to kindly bump up the ports version so the problem
can be fixed. I have also verified that puppet-devel works fine.
Thanks
Subhro
