"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
fl> There's an open PR with patches for this feature (ports/108514). Could
fl> you have a look and maybe send your comments?
Oh, sorry, I did not notice that. I will read the PR and follow-ups
first. Thank you for the point
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like your comments about the attached patch. This is for
> adding USE_UID and USE_GID which allow uid/gid addition on
> installation and the removal on deinstallation. It uses
> ${PORTSDIR}/[GU]IDs for
Hiroki Sato ha scritto:
I would like your comments about the attached patch.
Not tested, but it's a great idea. BTW, a lot of ports still check for /
add www uid/gid, but actually we have such user in base system in all
supported releases. Can/Should we drop such checks?
--
Alex Dupre
Hi Hiroki!
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:32:50 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch includes an example of rewrite of an existing
> ports (japanese/sj3-server). After investigating ~300 ports in the
> ports tree which add uid/gid I think the attached implementation
Hello,
I would like your comments about the attached patch. This is for
adding USE_UID and USE_GID which allow uid/gid addition on
installation and the removal on deinstallation. It uses
${PORTSDIR}/[GU]IDs for the detail information and can eliminate
complex shell scripts from individual p
