On 2014-Feb-04 21:38:42 +, "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen"
wrote:
>/usr/home/stephen/sage/work/sage-6.0/local/lib contained
>libreadline.so.6. But for ld to work, it also had to contain a link
>libreadline.so->libreadline.so.6.
>
>(Is this sort of behavior documented anywhere?)
I think it's sor
On 01/31/2014 11:31 AM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 01/31/14 07:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:19:46AM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>> wrote:
>>> I maintain the port math/sage. The port builds its own version of the
>>> libreadline library. The port also
On 01/31/14 07:25, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:19:46AM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
I maintain the port math/sage. The port builds its own version of the
libreadline library. The port also uses lang/gcc instead of clang,
because the port needs Fortran.
The
> The failure is when using FreeBSD-10. With FreeBSD-8 it works great. I
Building ports on 10.0-RELEASE is lots more trouble than 9.2-RELEASE.
10.0-RELEASE built 874, & 9.2-RELEASE built 953 & still making, with
http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/jhs/*/Makefile.local
cd
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:19:46AM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> I maintain the port math/sage. The port builds its own version of the
> libreadline library. The port also uses lang/gcc instead of clang,
> because the port needs Fortran.
>
> The port is wanting to create a shared lib
I maintain the port math/sage. The port builds its own version of the
libreadline library. The port also uses lang/gcc instead of clang,
because the port needs Fortran.
The port is wanting to create a shared library called libR.so, which it
wants to link with the libreadline library it created i
