On 2011-Aug-29 13:45:34 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>Peter Jeremy wrote on 29.08.2011 07:29:
>> Turns out that my python was dodgy.
...
>And did you realize what python option had triggered that? I'm curious
>since i'm wasn't able to reproduce it here. For me it looks like
>upstream bug de
Peter Jeremy wrote on 29.08.2011 07:29:
On 2011-Aug-26 15:05:35 +1000, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
I am having problems building devel/gobject-introspection on one
9.0-BETA1 host. I can build it without problems on 8.2 and another
9.0-BETA1 box. In all cases, I'm using gcc and amd64. The fa
On 2011-Aug-26 15:05:35 +1000, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
>I am having problems building devel/gobject-introspection on one
>9.0-BETA1 host. I can build it without problems on 8.2 and another
>9.0-BETA1 box. In all cases, I'm using gcc and amd64. The failure
>is:
...
>Since this
Peter Jeremy wrote on 26.08.2011 09:05:
I am having problems building devel/gobject-introspection on one
9.0-BETA1 host. I can build it without problems on 8.2 and another
9.0-BETA1 box. In all cases, I'm using gcc and amd64. The failure
is:
GISCAN GLib-2.0.gir
g-ir-scanner: GLib: wa
Peter Jeremy wrote on 26.08.2011 09:05:
I am having problems building devel/gobject-introspection on one
9.0-BETA1 host. I can build it without problems on 8.2 and another
9.0-BETA1 box. In all cases, I'm using gcc and amd64. The failure
is:
[skipped]
Note that if I go to the
I am having problems building devel/gobject-introspection on one
9.0-BETA1 host. I can build it without problems on 8.2 and another
9.0-BETA1 box. In all cases, I'm using gcc and amd64. The failure
is:
GISCAN GLib-2.0.gir
g-ir-scanner: GLib: warning: 484 warnings suppressed (use --warn-a
