On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 03:59:49PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:44:16PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > As long as cc is supported upstream, boost being a nightmare to maintain I
> > will reject all patches that are not accepted upstream first, otherwise
> > bump
Am 25.06.2014 16:23, schrieb Justin Hibbits:
> As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
> make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47.
And break all ports that require a boost .so library on any system that
uses clang for its base compiler.
If you use gcc47 to compile, you must s
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:33:33PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:03:42PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> >
> > On 06/26/14 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:03:42PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
> On 06/26/14 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wr
On 06/26/14 12:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 0
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:30:39AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
> wrote:
> > On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
> On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wro
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
make.conf, an
On 06/26/14 09:36, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
make.conf, an
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:44:16PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> As long as cc is supported upstream, boost being a nightmare to maintain I
> will reject all patches that are not accepted upstream first, otherwise
> bumping to 1.56 will be painful.
I'm currently trying to build it on PowerPC
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> >> As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
> >> make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47.
> > FAVO
On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47.
FAVORITE_COMPILER looks more like a hack to me. Ideally boost's port
Makefile should
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in
> make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47.
FAVORITE_COMPILER looks more like a hack to me. Ideally boost's port
Makefile should be fixed instead.
I also would rather use
On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 07:33:40 +
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:12:22PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:50:29AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > > depend upon failed. The largest issues are Boost and QT4 webkit.
> > > Boost has failed becaus
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:33:40AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> One thing bugs me about it: per https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8769,
Sorry, per
http://www.boost.org/users/news/a_special_note_for_boost_1_52_0_and_higher.html,
of course.
./danfe
__
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:12:22PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:50:29AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > depend upon failed. The largest issues are Boost and QT4 webkit. Boost has
> > failed because it seems to unconditionally prefer clang to gcc when both are
> > p
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 08:50:29AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> depend upon failed. The largest issues are Boost and QT4 webkit. Boost has
> failed because it seems to unconditionally prefer clang to gcc when both are
> present. On PowerPC, both are installed but GCC remains the default due to
Am 15.06.2014 17:50, schrieb Nathan Whitehorn:
> Over the last few weeks (2 cores makes the build take a long time!),
> I've built a complete set of 32-bit PowerPC packages for 10-STABLE,
> which can be found at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/powerpc-10-packages. This
Has Qt5 been ported to Ppc?
What were the build flags for Firefox-30.x?
On 6/17/14, Michael Copeland wrote:
> does --safe-mode work?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06/15/14 13:07, Jan Beich wrote:
>>
>>> firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
>>>
>>>
does --safe-mode work?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
>
> On 06/15/14 13:07, Jan Beich wrote:
>
>> firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
>>
>> Executing /obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-
>>> release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/xpcshell
On 06/15/14 13:07, Jan Beich wrote:
firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
Executing
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/xpcshell
-g
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0
On 06/15/14 13:07, Jan Beich wrote:
firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
Executing
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/xpcshell
-g
/obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/
firefox-29.0_1,1.txz.out.log writes:
> Executing
> /obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/xpcshell
> -g
> /obj/buildshare/ports/355755/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-powerpc-portbld-freebsd10.0/dist/bin/
> -a
> /obj/buildsh
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 08:50:29 -0700
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Over the last few weeks (2 cores makes the build take a long time!),
> I've built a complete set of 32-bit PowerPC packages for 10-STABLE,
> which can be found at
> http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/powerpc-
Over the last few weeks (2 cores makes the build take a long time!),
I've built a complete set of 32-bit PowerPC packages for 10-STABLE,
which can be found at
http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/powerpc-10-packages. This address
can be used as a pkg repository, but also contains a
26 matches
Mail list logo
