Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-11 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-May-11, at 11:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > I’m confused by this thread. isn’t the point of Poudriere > bulk builds to When I listed: # poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH FBSDFSSDjail 13.0-CURRENT amd64 nu

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-11 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all, I’m confused by this thread. isn’t the point of Poudriere bulk builds to - start with a clean jail - build the first port in the list and all dependencies - store the packages for later incorporation into the pkg repo - clean out the jail completely - start with the next port in the list

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-11 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
Leander Schaefer info at NetOcean.de wrote on Tue May 5 20:38:49 UTC 2020 : > I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most > issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with > another. Reason is mostly something like: > > pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-11 Thread Mathieu Arnold
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Leander Schaefer wrote: > Hello Chris, > > Hello List, > > I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive > downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how > the FreeBSD package managment team provides a

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-07 Thread Chris
On Thu, 7 May 2020 20:39:41 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said Hello Chris, Hello List, I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how the FreeBSD package managment team provides a c

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-07 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Leander Schaefer (i...@netocean.de): > Does anyone have the right clue about > how the FreeBSD package managment team provides a complete repository > without having these conflicts? There must be a way to do this with > poudriere since I am most certainly sure they also use poudriere. The

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-07 Thread Leander Schaefer
Hello Chris, Hello List, I have checked out ports-mgmt/synth unfortunately it would be a massive downgrade compared to poudriere. Does anyone have the right clue about how the FreeBSD package managment team provides a complete repository without having these conflicts? There must be a way to

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-05 Thread Leander Schaefer
Hello Chris, thanks for your reply. Thanks for the hint about ports-mgmt/synth. I am definitly going to have a look into this! Well, my Podriere is using Jails by default. Is there any hack you applied for this issue to avoid? Best regards, Leander Am 05.05.20 um 22:46 schrieb Chris: On

Re: Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-05 Thread Chris
On Tue, 5 May 2020 22:38:36 +0200 Leander Schaefer i...@netocean.de said Hello, I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with another. Reason is mostly something like: pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.0.

Poudriere - Compile ALL Ports

2020-05-05 Thread Leander Schaefer
Hello, I have been dealing with Poudriere for quite a while and one of the most issues I have is, that I have ports which won't compile along with another. Reason is mostly something like: pkg-static: ImageMagick7-7.0.10.6 conflicts with ImageMagick6-6.9.11.6,1 (installs files into the same