On 26 March 2012 07:26, Radim Kolar wrote:
>> I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in
>> more than one CVE, and will not be fixed.
> CVE Yes, but if you need particular DB version for your app, user will
> install it anyway. For security related point of view it do
> I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable
in more than one CVE, and will not be fixed.
CVE Yes, but if you need particular DB version for your app, user will
install it anyway. For security related point of view it does not matter
if he installs it from ports or not
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 06:18:16PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:54:36PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote:
> > >
> > > please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old
> > postgresql-contrib full text search
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:54:36PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote:
> >
> > please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old
> postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not
> possible for such applications.
>
> I'm afr
On 25 Mar 2012 13:51, "Radim Kolar" wrote:
>
> please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old
postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not
possible for such applications.
I'm afraid it's not only end of life by upstream, but also vulnerable in
more tha
please do not remove this pgsql branch. its newest branch using old
postgresql-contrib full text search engine. Upgrading to 8.3+ is not
possible for such applications.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
