Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-24 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
Hi, On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Mark Terribile wrote: > > And finally, I ask for any general wisdom or hints in dealing with SANE and > SANE with USB devices. > Check out this thread for hints about debugging SANE and USB devices: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2010-January/

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-24 Thread Alexey Shuvaev
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 02:00:46PM -0700, Mark Terribile wrote: > Thanks to help from Warren Block and Lowell Gilbert, > I now have the offical ported version of sane-backends-1.0.21 running. > Unfortunately, it's behaving the same way as before, > apparently not properly recognizing the USB device

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-23 Thread Mark Terribile
Thanks to help from Warren Block and Lowell Gilbert, I now have the offical ported version of sane-backends-1.0.21 running. Unfortunately, it's behaving the same way as before, apparently not properly recognizing the USB device. It Does anyone have experience using this? Or better yet, some

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-23 Thread Warren Block
On Sun, 23 May 2010, Mark Terribile wrote: sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this morning... I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupgrade and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even though the INDEX-7 file indicates that the sane-backend version is 1.0.21 I keep getti

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-23 Thread Mark Terribile
Lowell, --- On Sun, 5/23/10, Lowell Gilbert > > Warren, > > > >> > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this > >> morning... > >> > >> I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried > portupgrade > >> and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even > though the > >> INDEX-7 file indicates t

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-23 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Mark Terribile writes: > Warren, > >> > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this >> morning... >> >> I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupgrade >> and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even though the >> INDEX-7 file indicates that the sane-backend version is >> 1.0.21 I

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-23 Thread Mark Terribile
Warren, > > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this > morning... > > I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupgrade > and pkgdb -FU followed by portupgrade and even though the > INDEX-7 file indicates that the sane-backend version is > 1.0.21 I keep getting 1.0.20 downloaded.

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-23 Thread Mark Terribile
Warren, > > If this is the wrong place, please be gentle!  I need > to get a Canon 8800F scanner running on FreeBSD 7.2 .  > SANE's latest version is said to support this scanner. > > sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this morning... I'm sorry to be further trouble, but I've tried portupg

Re: Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-22 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 22 May 2010, Mark Terribile wrote: If this is the wrong place, please be gentle!  I need to get a Canon 8800F scanner running on FreeBSD 7.2 . SANE's latest version is said to support this scanner. sane-backends 1.0.21 showed up in ports this morning... I have gotten a copy of it t

Porting SANE backend 1.0.21 to FreeBSD 7.2

2010-05-22 Thread Mark Terribile
If this is the wrong place, please be gentle!  I need to get a Canon 8800F scanner running on FreeBSD 7.2 . SANE's latest version is said to support this scanner. I have gotten a copy of it to build (and fed a few minor problems back to the people at the SANE project: https://alioth.debian.or