On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:16:38AM -0500 I heard the voice of
Matthew D. Fuller, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I recommend "ignore it, it doesn't matter".
Or alternately phrased, use "-l'<'" instead of "-L=", like I always
do. There are various reasons I'd have installed a newer version than
INDEX
On 2014-03-23 13:02, Jerry wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:42:22 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
>
>> Am 23.03.2014 12:39, schrieb Jerry:
>>
>>> /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update
>>> /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
>>> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
>>>
>>> I just reran those command and it produced the exac
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:02:41AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jerry, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I tried your suggestion with negative results. Any other ideas?
Yes, the one I already sent :)
You're running WITH_NEW_XORG, which changes the versions of various X
ports. Either explicitly enabled
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:42:22 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
> Am 23.03.2014 12:39, schrieb Jerry:
>
> > /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update
> > /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
> > /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
> >
> > I just reran those command and it produced the exact same results.
>
> portsdb is irrele
Am 23.03.2014 12:39, schrieb Jerry:
> /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update
> /usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
>
> I just reran those command and it produced the exact same results.
portsdb is irrelevant here, did you check portsnap output, did it
succeed? Is your system clock
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:15:31 +0100, olli hauer stated:
/usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
> On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote:
> > When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
> >
> > /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
> >
> > It produced the following output:
> >
> > dri-9.1.7_3,2
On Sunday, March 23, 2014, 6:15:31 AM, olli wrote:
> On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote:
>> When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
>>
>> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
>>
>> It produced the following output:
>>
>> dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index
On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote:
> When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
>
> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
>
> It produced the following output:
>
> dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2)
> libEGL-9.1.7 > succe
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 07:05:13AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jerry, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2)
> libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1)
> libGL-9.1.7> succeeds in
On 3/23/2014 12:05 PM, Jerry wrote:
When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
/usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
It produced the following output:
dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2)
libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (i
Am 23.03.2014 12:05, schrieb Jerry:
> When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
>
> /usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
>
> It produced the following output:
>
> dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2)
> libEGL-9.1.7 > suc
When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
/usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
It produced the following output:
dri-9.1.7_3,2 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1_3,2)
libEGL-9.1.7 > succeeds index (index has 7.6.1)
libGL-9.1.7
I'm upgrading ftp/proftpd. The new release is 1.3.1rc1.
I have this in the makefile:
PORTNAME= proftpd
DISTVERSION=1.3.1rc1
PORTREVISION=
Make fetches the sources with no problem, but when I start the build I noticed
the version had been changed to 1.3.1.r1. Further when I tried a port
13 matches
Mail list logo
