Re: Port maintenance

2020-06-29 Thread Jonathan Chen
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 09:20, Brandon helsley wrote: > > Okay, I use the nvidia 390 driver and nvidia-xsettings, but they both have no > maintainer. I read all the material about what the responsibilitys are for a > maintainer and I think I can do a couple. I got a message from portscout > abou

Re: Port maintenance

2020-06-29 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 29. Jun 2020, at 23:20, Brandon helsley > wrote: > > Okay, I use the nvidia 390 driver That one is already maintained by danfe@. > and nvidia-xsettings I only see nvidia-xconfig and nvidia-settings, both which have no maintainer. > , but they both have no maintainer. I read all the ma

Re: Port maintenance

2020-06-29 Thread Brandon helsley
Okay, I use the nvidia 390 driver and nvidia-xsettings, but they both have no maintainer. I read all the material about what the responsibilitys are for a maintainer and I think I can do a couple. I got a message from portscout about a couple of ports that needed updated. I didn't s

Re: Port maintenance

2020-06-28 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 29. Jun 2020, at 00:18, Brandon helsley > wrote: > >  > > > > > I'm getting started reading the porters handbook. I was wondering if I can > adopt a port to practice maintaining one without the experience to keep it > properly updated at first. I'm a little intimidated by contribut

Port maintenance

2020-06-28 Thread Brandon helsley
I'm getting started reading the porters handbook. I was wondering if I can adopt a port to practice maintaining one without the experience to keep it properly updated at first. I'm a little intimidated by contributing and not sure how best to learn the porters handbook. I guess read it

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-12-09 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/15/2012 02:45, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Nov-14, 14:52, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> I'm sorry, I'm not seeing what I'm missing. > > As I said, PORTREVISION, distinfo, and the patch files. Look them up in > the handbook. > PORTREVISION: not seeing a problem As for the patch files, if

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-15 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Nov-14, 14:52, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > Off-list > > On 11/13/12 01:59, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2012-Nov-08, 09:12, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > >> On 11/08/12 03:13, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >> > >>> By the way, Tcl/Tk 8.5.13 is bound to be released in the next few days > >>> (the firs

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-12 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Nov-08, 09:12, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 11/08/12 03:13, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > By the way, Tcl/Tk 8.5.13 is bound to be released in the next few days > > (the first RC is out now, actually). You might want to include the > > update in your diff :) > > > > http://pastebin.com/Uma

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/08/12 20:59, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 8 November 2012 21:42, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> On 11/08/12 09:33, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> On 8 November 2012 09:56, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > The tr -> ${TR} conversion is also wrong, you're changing what the sed > liner is looking for. If you

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Eitan Adler
On 8 November 2012 21:42, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 11/08/12 09:33, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On 8 November 2012 09:56, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: The tr -> ${TR} conversion is also wrong, you're changing what the sed liner is looking for. If you do so, it won't find it anymore. >>> >>> Tha

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/08/12 09:33, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 8 November 2012 09:56, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >>> The tr -> ${TR} conversion is also wrong, you're changing what the sed >>> liner is looking for. If you do so, it won't find it anymore. >> >> That was one of many suggestions from portlint. > > try make

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Eitan Adler
On 8 November 2012 09:56, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> The tr -> ${TR} conversion is also wrong, you're changing what the sed >> liner is looking for. If you do so, it won't find it anymore. > > That was one of many suggestions from portlint. try make -VTR to see what the difference is. Keep in min

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/08/12 03:13, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > By the way, Tcl/Tk 8.5.13 is bound to be released in the next few days > (the first RC is out now, actually). You might want to include the > update in your diff :) > http://pastebin.com/UmasjFfz -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves in

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/08/12 03:13, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Nov-07, 17:12, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> On 11/06/12 02:20, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> >>> * I won't comment on the LICENSE stuff, I don't know enough about it >>> >>> * XFT_DESC >>> This is already defined in bsd.options.desc.mk. I'd say that >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-08 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Nov-07, 17:12, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 11/06/12 02:20, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > * I won't comment on the LICENSE stuff, I don't know enough about it > > > > * XFT_DESC > > This is already defined in bsd.options.desc.mk. I'd say that > > "Xft font library" is ok as a descripti

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-07 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/06/12 02:20, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > * I won't comment on the LICENSE stuff, I don't know enough about it > > * XFT_DESC > This is already defined in bsd.options.desc.mk. I'd say that > "Xft font library" is ok as a description. > > * LIB_DEPENDS+= Xft:${PORTSDIR}/x11-fonts/libXft >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-06 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/06/12 02:20, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > * I won't comment on the LICENSE stuff, I don't know enough about it I've checked and there are no official endorsements of Tcl/Tk license except from CopyFree folks. FSF and OSI don't even mention Tcl/Tk license. > * XFT_DESC > This is already define

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-06 Thread Pietro Cerutti
;>>> New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint > >>>> complains: > >>>> > >>>> portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/ > >>>> WARN: Makefile: unless this is a master port, COMMENT has to be set by >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-06 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
t >>>> complains: >>>> >>>> portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/ >>>> WARN: Makefile: unless this is a master port, COMMENT has to be set by >>>> "=", not by "?=". >>> >>> This *is* a master port, so it&

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-05 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
http://pastebin.com/GSG0Y19W -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://owl.ap

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-04 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
t >>>> complains: >>>> >>>> portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/ >>>> WARN: Makefile: unless this is a master port, COMMENT has to be set by >>>> "=", not by "?=". >>> >>> This *is* a master port, so it&

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-02 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 11/02/12 06:21, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > This won't apply, either. Could you provide a diff as dumped by svn diff > in tk85's directory? > from within /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk85 on the "original" root@alex-laptop#> svn diff Makefile Index: Makefile =

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-11-02 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 12:41, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 10/31/12 11:55, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2012-Oct-31, 11:28, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > >> New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint > >> complains: > >> > >> portl

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 11:55, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Oct-31, 11:28, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint >> complains: >> >> portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/ >> WARN: Makefile: unless this is a mast

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
> > Hunk #1 failed at 1. > > Hunk #2 failed at 7. > > Hunk #3 failed at 40. > > Hunk #4 failed at 58. > > Hunk #5 failed at 420. > > 5 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej > > done > > > > New diff[0], undoing some of the earl

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
t; Hunk #5 failed at 420. > 5 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej > done > New diff[0], undoing some of the earlier changes even though portlint complains: portlint ~/port-maintenance/tk85/ WARN: Makefile: unless this is a master port, COMMENT has to be set by "=&q

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 10:39, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> patch < tk85.diff > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -- > |--- Makefile.orig 2012-10-26 19:47:37.0 -0500 > |+++ Makefile 2012-10-29 20:16:13.0 -0500 >

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 15:25, Chris Rees wrote: > On 31 Oct 2012 15:21, "Pietro Cerutti" wrote: > > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > > > >> > > > >> I'd like to volun

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 31 Oct 2012 15:21, "Pietro Cerutti" wrote: > > On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > > >> Hi All, > > >> > > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > > >>

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a >> working update to it. All changes were due to fe

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:49, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Please be informed that I have in the pipeline some work on Tcl/Tk ports, > including removal of the -thread slaves. Okay > Having said that, I don't have any major concerns about you taking > maintainership of tk85, apart from the technical details poi

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a >> working update to it. All changes were due to fe

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a > working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portlint. > Any and all feedback wo

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2012-Oct-31, 08:36, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > On 10/31/12 08:24, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 31 October 2012 13:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
On 10/31/12 08:24, Chris Rees wrote: > On 31 October 2012 13:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a >> working update to it. All changes were due to fe

Re: tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Chris Rees
On 31 October 2012 13:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun > making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a > working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portlint. > Any and all feedback

tk85 Port Maintenance

2012-10-31 Thread Joseph a Nagy Jr
Hi All, I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and have a working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portlint. Any and all feedback would be appreciated. [0]: http://pastebin.com/6DuzdAzv --