On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
Here's a wild idea. Why do we need to display the variable names?
Context or shorthand--some people are going to look for familiar options
by that visual shortcut.
Losing the setting names only regains ten or fifteen characters anyway.
That is mostly
Here's a wild idea. Why do we need to display the variable names?
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 6/23/2012 2:32 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> I think this is a bug in dialog(1). It is the result of a description
>> extending past the end of the line as happens with the NLS
>> description.
>
> I get the same behavior on FreeBSD 8.3.
>
>
On 6/23/2012 2:32 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I think this is a bug in dialog(1). It is the result of a description
> extending past the end of the line as happens with the NLS
> description.
I get the same behavior on FreeBSD 8.3.
I've submitted a PR to lessen the length of the NLS description, a
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Peggy Wilkins wrote:
> Here is a screen shot of what I'm seeing when I run "make config" for
> security/sudo:
>
> http://mozart.lib.uchicago.edu/mozart/images/sudo-config.jpg
>
> The leftmost column is mostly empty. I can get it to partially
> display by moving
Here is a screen shot of what I'm seeing when I run "make config" for
security/sudo:
http://mozart.lib.uchicago.edu/mozart/images/sudo-config.jpg
The leftmost column is mostly empty. I can get it to partially
display by moving my cursor up and down the list, but it doesn't ever
draw properly.
