Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues

2011-08-30 Thread Robert Huff
Matthias Andree writes: > > The user decided to go a specific path by initially choosing a > > specific set of OPTIONs. We *must* assume that the user had good > > reasons to do so. We should *not* assume the user has no idea what > > he's doing and needs to be guided. The latter would make

Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues

2011-08-30 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 30.08.2011 12:28, schrieb Frank Wall: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:40:25AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Euhm, while workable I don't like that approach. And I conclude that >> the way the OPTIONS system currently works has a serious shortcoming, in >> that it does not report changed default

Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues

2011-08-30 Thread Frank Wall
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:40:25AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Euhm, while workable I don't like that approach. And I conclude that > the way the OPTIONS system currently works has a serious shortcoming, in > that it does not report changed defaults to the user. > > Basically in this situatio

Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues

2011-08-30 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 28.08.2011 22:42, schrieb Doug Barton: > On 8/28/2011 10:46 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 19:41:02 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: >> >>> just a brain flash: bsd.port.mk currently re-prompts OPTIONS if >>> they've changed, for instance, through addition. >>> >>> Should we change

Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues

2011-08-28 Thread Doug Barton
On 8/28/2011 10:46 AM, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 19:41:02 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > >> just a brain flash: bsd.port.mk currently re-prompts OPTIONS if >> they've changed, for instance, through addition. >> >> Should we change this feature in b.p.mk so that it also re-prompt

Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues (was: How to handle upgrade of libnotify when cups-client-1.4.8 is marked as broken)

2011-08-28 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 19:41:02 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > just a brain flash: bsd.port.mk currently re-prompts OPTIONS if > they've changed, for instance, through addition. > > Should we change this feature in b.p.mk so that it also re-prompt the > user when the defaults have changed? Sound

Re: OPTIONS framework bug vs. SSL issues (was: How to handle upgrade of libnotify when cups-client-1.4.8 is marked as broken)

2011-08-28 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 28.08.2011 16:33, schrieb Chris Rees: > make -C /usr/ports/print/cups-client config, disable TLS. > > Chris > On 28 Aug 2011 15:15, "Leslie Jensen" wrote: >> >> Following the instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING I issued the command >> >> >> portmaster -r libnotify-0 >> >> And after a while I g