On Sat, 5 Jan 2013, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
05.01.2013 09:09, Kevin Oberman ?:
pkg_libchk does not count old libraries in
the compat folder, so it will still report the problem ports even
though you use '-w'.
Are you sure? From PKG_L
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 05.01.2013 09:09, Kevin Oberman пишет:
>
>> pkg_libchk does not count old libraries in
>> the compat folder, so it will still report the problem ports even
>> though you use '-w'.
>
> Are you sure? From PKG_LIBCHK(1):
> -
> DESCRIPTION
>
05.01.2013 09:09, Kevin Oberman пишет:
> pkg_libchk does not count old libraries in
> the compat folder, so it will still report the problem ports even
> though you use '-w'.
Are you sure? From PKG_LIBCHK(1):
-
DESCRIPTION
The pkg_libchk script uses pkg_info(1), ldd(1) and readelf(1) to
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> As many of you noticed, the update of devel/pcre bumped hte version of
>> libpcre.so which is a dependency of LOTS of things. Here are some
>> incomplete notes on what might bite you: Note that I refer to
>> pkg_libch
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> As many of you noticed, the update of devel/pcre bumped hte version of
> libpcre.so which is a dependency of LOTS of things. Here are some
> incomplete notes on what might bite you: Note that I refer to
> pkg_libchk. It is part of sysutils/bsddminscripts. If you run pkgng,
>
I agree.
On the other hand, we should also mark yet unmarked ports that directly
depend on pcre.
The main pain comes from glib20, ports using it are directly linked
against pcre but there is no information about this and we need this
documented.
I am releasing devel/pcre back to ports@, who wants
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tijl Coosemans ha scritto:
>> It says that the new shared lib is compatible with the old lib
>> (only new interfaces were added), since:
>>
>> 1 - 0 = 3 - 2 = 1 1 - 0 = 2 - 2 = 0
Ops, the last should be 0 - 0 obviously.
>> (from the [current:revisio
On 12-12-2012 10:03, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Kevin Oberman ha scritto:
>> As many of you noticed, the update of devel/pcre bumped hte version of
>> libpcre.so which is a dependency of LOTS of things.
>
> This was a very poor choice, we shouldn't have bumped the version. When
> there is a bump between
Kevin Oberman ha scritto:
> As many of you noticed, the update of devel/pcre bumped hte version of
> libpcre.so which is a dependency of LOTS of things.
This was a very poor choice, we shouldn't have bumped the version. When
there is a bump between two minor releases (8.31 -> 8.32) a red led
shoul
On 11 December 2012 18:18, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> As many of you noticed, the update of devel/pcre bumped hte version of
> libpcre.so which is a dependency of LOTS of things. Here are some
> incomplete notes on what might bite you: Note that I refer to
> pkg_libchk. It is part of sysutils/bsddmins
As many of you noticed, the update of devel/pcre bumped hte version of
libpcre.so which is a dependency of LOTS of things. Here are some
incomplete notes on what might bite you: Note that I refer to
pkg_libchk. It is part of sysutils/bsddminscripts. If you run pkgng,
you will need to edit it an cha
11 matches
Mail list logo
