Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
[...]
> For example, you have:
> OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" on
>
> and in /etc/make.conf:
> WITHOUT_CWRAPPER= yes # I don't want any *** C wrappers!!!
>
> Thus, both WITHOUT_CWRAPPER and WITH_CWRAPPER will be defined, but the
> port will behave correctly if
* Rainer Schwarze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You have the powers of a seer :-)
> This is what I was appending to OPTIONS:
> CWRAPPER "use C wrapper (no suid perl script needed)" on
:))
> > .include
> >
> > .if !defined(WITHOUT_CWRAPPER)
>
> Just a newbie question: Is there a reason to use
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Rainer Schwarze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the
>> replacement is performed?
> On my system similar stuff works without problems. First check all
[...]
I found the problem: The Makefile which I am work
* Rainer Schwarze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the
> replacement is performed?
On my system similar stuff works without problems. First check all
variable names in both SUB_LIST and *.in (i.e. WRAPER or something
like that, seems t
Hi,
I'd like to adjust a port and need to change SUB_LIST and a
./files/pkg-install.in script. I adjusted the SUB_LIST variable but the
variable-replacements are not done to the appropriate files. I'll
present parts of my files and ask a few questions at the end of my email.
(BTW: I'm working on t
