In article ,
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
>> Something like the following.
>>
>> [/usr/local/bin/]
>> libstdc++.so/usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so
>> libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so.6
> That looks quite nice, and
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
>> Something like the following.
>>
>> [/usr/local/bin/]
>> libstdc++.so/usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so
>> libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so.6
>
>That looks quite nice, and I was going to us
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
> Something like the following.
>
> [/usr/local/bin/]
> libstdc++.so/usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so
> libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so.6
That looks quite nice, and I was going to use that, alas I cannot
seem to
Thanks for considertion...
> Anything else?
Simply back out for this moment, until we have some clues..
From: Gerald Pfeifer
Subject: Need to use some library path before /usr/lib
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:45:10 +0200 (CEST)
> Building some (Fortran) applications with lang/gcc44 it tur
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:24 -, jasonh wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:45 -, gerald wrote:
Building some (Fortran) applications with lang/gcc44 it turns out we get
weird failures upon startup which look like:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11
required
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:45 -, gerald wrote:
Building some (Fortran) applications with lang/gcc44 it turns out we get
weird failures upon startup which look like:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11
required by ./gendoc not found
What is happening here is
Building some (Fortran) applications with lang/gcc44 it turns out we get
weird failures upon startup which look like:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version GLIBCXX_3.4.11
required by ./gendoc not found
What is happening here is that lang/gcc44 lays down
/usr/local/lib/gcc4
