On 10/29/07, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:14:26 -0500
> Novembre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for your patches and notice. I didn't CC you since I was
> > thinking that I'm doing something wrong myself (I'm still not very
> > experienced in F
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:14:26 -0500
Novembre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your patches and notice. I didn't CC you since I was
> thinking that I'm doing something wrong myself (I'm still not very
> experienced in FreeBSD). One thing I didn't quite get is that do I
> have to wait fo
On 10/25/07, Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 01:01:33 -0500
> Novembre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
> Hello.
>
> I have fixed the problem together with the NTFS-3G 1.1004 update. A
> part of the fix involves fusefs-kmod and needs maintainer approval, b
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 01:01:33 -0500
Novembre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hello.
I have fixed the problem together with the NTFS-3G 1.1004 update. A
part of the fix involves fusefs-kmod and needs maintainer approval, but
is trivial. See below for the details.
> The ongoing problem with mou
> > Well, I gave up using /etc/fstab to mount NTFS partitions at boot time a
> > couple of months ago when I realized that it's not the correct way to do it
> > (so I also wrote an rc.d script to do the job, but I'll talk about it
> > later). However, I recently looked at fusefs-ntfs source files,
On 10/7/07, Craig Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Novembre wrote:
> > On 10/7/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
>
> > Well, I gave up using /etc/fstab to mount NTFS partitions at boot time a
> > couple of months ago when I realized that it's not the correct way to do it
> > (so I also wrote an rc.d script to do the job, but I'll talk about it
> > later). However, I recently looked at fusefs-ntfs source files,
Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
On 10/7/07, Mel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
>
> > On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
> > > > The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
> > >
> > > loaded.
> > >
>
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
> On 10/7/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
> > > The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
> >
> > loaded.
> >
> > Well isn't it sort of pointless to proceed until you get
Oh, the kernel module IS loaded as shown in 'dmesg -a' and in
/var/log/messages. However, it can't be loaded unless / and /usr file
systems are mounted. That's what I meant in my post when I said "the first
error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet loaded", since the
mounting comes f
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet loaded.
Well isn't it sort of pointless to proceed until you get the kernel module
loaded at boot time and then see what happens next?
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Hi,
The ongoing problem with mounting my NTFS partition at boot time still
remains. I have upgraded ntfs-3g to the latest version from ports:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ pkg_info | grep fuse
fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1 Kernel module for fuse
fusefs-libs-2.7.0_1 FUSE allows filesystem implementation
13 matches
Mail list logo
