On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 04:27:37PM -0700, Kurt Abahar wrote:
> However, I don't know how to get a hold of this "lag
> time." Is it a few days, a few weeks or ... ?
You can get an _idea_ of the degree of the lag via the following URL:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/packagestats.html
The
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:07:25 +1000
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem is more that there's a noticable delay between a
> port being updated and a matching set of packages being available.
At least for me, it hardly ever is an actual problem. I mean, building ports
fr
On 2007-Jul-27 07:51:57 +0100, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Would it be feasible to use CVS tags to mark the state of the ports
>tree whenever a package is successfully rebuilt by the cluster and
>pushed out to the FTP servers?
This would generate an immense amount of CVS repo churn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Ven 27 jul 07 à 3:44:32 +0200, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> écrivait :
>> Kurt Abahar wrote:
>
>>> I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
>>> time to compile them. Therefore, I'm trying to use
>>> pac
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Kurt Abahar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Side note: I'm asking because I would definitely be
> willing to contribute since this would make using
> ports and packages together much easier.
I think the issue is one of building tens of thousands of applicati
Le Ven 27 jul 07 à 3:44:32 +0200, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> Kurt Abahar wrote:
> > I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
> > time to compile them. Therefore, I'm trying to use
> > packages as much as possible. After updating the ports
> > tree using portsnap, p
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No such facility
> exists, and I don't imagine anyone creating one any
> time soon because
> it would be VERY hard to accomplish for a large
> number of reasons.
If you don't mind, could you please elaborate on this?
Side note: I'm asking because I w
Kurt Abahar wrote:
> --- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're
>> trying to
>> accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just
>> describe what your
>> goal is.
>
> I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
> time to compile them
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're
> trying to
> accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just
> describe what your
> goal is.
I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
time to compile them. Therefore, I'm trying to use
pa
Kurt Abahar wrote:
> I have tried the portupgrade way, but unfortunately
> the packages lag behind ports the majority of the
> time.
It's actually 100% of the time, and always will be.
> This led me to think that keeping the ports tree
> a little behind HEAD would be a better solution.
> However
--- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Kurt Abahar wrote:
> > I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
> > synchronized with that from which the latest
> packages
> > in packages-6-stable were built.
> >
> > Is there a way to accomplish this?
>
> Sure,
On Jul 26, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Kurt Abahar wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with that from which the latest packages
in packages-6-stable were built.
Is there a way to accomplish this?
Sure, you probably want something like "portupgrade -P" or
"portupgrade -P
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with that from which the latest packages
in packages-6-stable were built.
Is there a way to accomplish this?
Thank you
Be a bet
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with the latest packages in order to
minimize version mismatches and to allow easy mixing
between them. So far I've been using a hack that does
a listing of the packages-6-stable directory on the
freebsd ftp, and uses the mt
14 matches
Mail list logo
