On 08/20/2010 16:31, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 4:16 PM -0700 8/20/10, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
Nonetheless, I'll try to look on what I can do. But I can't promise anything,
because
this is really something that should be done on ruby side.
Thanks. You may get some pushback because other package
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:55:33 -0400
Eitan Adler mentioned:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> > Greetings again. When doing a "make install", it takes *forever* in the
> > "Generating RDoc documentation" step. This isn't a big deal the first time,
> > but when updating Rub
At 4:16 PM -0700 8/20/10, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:55:33 -0400
>Eitan Adler mentioned:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> > Greetings again. When doing a "make install", it takes *forever* in the
>> > "Generating RDoc documentation" step. This isn'
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again. When doing a "make install", it takes *forever* in the
> "Generating RDoc documentation" step. This isn't a big deal the first time,
> but when updating Ruby (such as for the recent security announcement), you
> need to do
Greetings again. When doing a "make install", it takes *forever* in the
"Generating RDoc documentation" step. This isn't a big deal the first time, but
when updating Ruby (such as for the recent security announcement), you need to
do a "make deinstall" before you do a "make reinstall". Having th
