Hi porters,
Some users experience problems upgrading Yabb form 2.1 to 2.4
because they don't really read the Yabb install procedure carefully.
Even upgrade isn't destructive, I think it will be good to add those few
lines in
the UPGRADING file to prevent users.
AFFECTS: users of www/yab
Status update.
I've now begun producing regular builds from GCC SVN for GCC, G++, GNAT
and fortran on 7.2 amd64. The build logs are published here:
http://gcc.coreland.ath.cx/
I'm hoping this will increase awareness of regressions before they make
their way back into releases (the formal GCC r
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
On 2009-11-11 15:07:36, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Oh, I see. Did you configure it with host=i386-unknown-freebsd
and target=amd64-unknown-freebsd (or is it x86_64?)?
It looks like libgcc might not have support for x86_64
FreeBSD??
Full
On 2009-11-11 15:07:36, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Oh, I see. Did you configure it with host=i386-unknown-freebsd
> and target=amd64-unknown-freebsd (or is it x86_64?)?
>
> It looks like libgcc might not have support for x86_64
> FreeBSD??
Full configure line was:
../src/configure \
--ena
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
On 2009-11-11 14:48:35, Daniel Eischen wrote:
/gnat/gpl-2009/src/GNAT/obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/gnat/gpl-2009/src/GNAT/obj/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2/bin/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/x86_
On 2009-11-11 14:48:35, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > /gnat/gpl-2009/src/GNAT/obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/gnat/gpl-2009/src/GNAT/obj/./gcc/
> > -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2/bin/
> > -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2/lib/ -isystem
> > /usr/local/x86_64-unknown-freebsd7.2/include -isystem
> > /u
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
On 2009-11-08 00:06:16, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Patches for amd64 support are also welcome. I thought you were
going to do a port for GNAT-gpl amd64?
'Lo.
I just tried to compile the vanilla GNAT-GPL 2009 sources today and
came across
On 2009-11-08 00:06:16, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Patches for amd64 support are also welcome. I thought you were
> going to do a port for GNAT-gpl amd64?
'Lo.
I just tried to compile the vanilla GNAT-GPL 2009 sources today and
came across the following error:
/gnat/gpl-2009/src/GNAT/obj/./gcc/
On 2009-11-07 22:06:36, Mark Linimon wrote:
>
> There were several more working, but a recent compiler update broke them.
> At that time the portmgr team went ahead and marked the ports "broken".
> That both advises users that they don't compile, and also triggers a
> periodic email to the ports@ m
'Lo,
On 2009-11-08 00:06:16, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> The packages are way out of date and don't build with the newer
> GNAT's. Patches welcome.
Right!
> > PROBLEM 3. Compiler version chaos and lack of architecture support
> >
> >We have:
> >
> > lang/gnat (GPL 2009 version, i
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
[Apologies for the possible double-post, I mistyped the From: address]
Hello.
It's come to my attention that the FreeBSD ports system has very poor support
for Ada and Ada software in general.
A quick search on Freshports for 'Ada' show
It's true that the Ada packages have suffered a fair amount of bit-rot
in the past year or so. I'm happy to see someone stepping forward to
work on them.
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:29:36PM +, freebsd-po...@coreland.ath.cx wrote:
> PROBLEM 1. Lack of packages
>
> Of the 10 packages liste
[Apologies for the possible double-post, I mistyped the From: address]
Hello.
It's come to my attention that the FreeBSD ports system has very poor support
for Ada and Ada software in general.
A quick search on Freshports for 'Ada' shows the following packages:
devel/adabooch- No de
13 matches
Mail list logo
