* Jeremy Messenger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How do you deal with the security? It will be required for all ports that
> depend on a port to be rebuild, so bump the PORTREVISION will be need. But
> what about for non-static that don't need to be bump? A solution for that
> might be need too.
On 2007-Oct-06 21:20:24 +0300, Diomidis Spinellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I can give you quantitative data on the benefits of shared objects. On a
>web server running FreeBSD 6.2 I found 98 shared objects sharing 16,790,901
>bytes of memory through 1,002 mappings.
>Without shared libraries t
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Gary Kline wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >
> >>Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce pack
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 03:05:36PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
> >>help produce packages withou
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:03:04 -0500, Dmitry Marakasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STAT
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:20:24PM +0300, Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
> Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
>>> help produce packages without any depends, wh
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
What I'd like to see first is some quantitative researc
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:03:04PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
> help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
> sometimes.
What I'd like to see first is some quantitative research on the
benefits o
Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STATIC_BUILD variable that changes usual build behavior
- Proce
Hi!
I just have an idea that may be useful: static port builds. This can
help produce packages without any depends, which may be useful
sometimes.
Implementation seem pretty straightfoward to me:
- Introduce STATIC_BUILD variable that changes usual build behavior
- Process LIB_DEPENDS in a differ
12 matches
Mail list logo
